It's tough for anyone to write a biography of Napoleon because so very many people have already done it before, making it hard to make a new book distinct and different. Philip Dwyer broadly succeeds in doing this, but his book remains only a partial success all the same.
Indeed, it was the most obviously 'new' thing Dwyer has to say about Napoleon that I found amongst the least interesting aspects of the book. Essentially, Dwyer portrays Napoleon as what today we would term a spin doctor par excellence. OK, fine, Napoleon did use art and newspapers and proclamations to portray himself in a particular, very favourable light, but then he was a political figure, so what do you expect? That's not meant as a general slur at politicians, rather as an observation that people in political life have always 'spun' things since time immemorial. Sure, Napoleon was particularly good at it, but one almost gets the impression from Dwyer's book that he practically invented the art of spin. This overstates the case and was, I felt, a rather weak pillar upon which to build a biography of the French emperor.
Fortunately, in spite of the above, there is much in Dwyer's book to commend it. He broadly manages to be fair and even-handed, although one does sense that, if pushed, Dwyer would put himself in the Bonaparte detractor camp. Some sections are very enjoyable, like the parts dealing with Bonaparte's relationship with Josephine or much of the section on the Egyptian expedition. The book is also easy to read and never becomes bogged down. That said, I felt the writing lacked real sparkle and excitement. Napoleon's life must be one of the most entertaining stories in history, yet Dwyer's account of it was a bit, well, flat. This is not a boring book by any means, but neither is it a real page turner and I can recall no sections that made the pulse race. Perhaps that's partly a personal taste issue, as much of the most exciting writing on Napoleon, I find, concerns his military exploits, and they are rather thinly covered in this book. Some readers will doubtless be glad of a Bonaparte biography that is light on war, but others, like myself, will wish Dwyer had spent a bit more time on Napoleon's early campaigns, especially those in Italy.
Overall, this is a worthy enough book and I certainly don't regret spending the time it took to read it, yet at the same time it left me feeling somewhat disappointed and unsatisfied. Hopefully the second volume of the biography will be more exciting.