I had this on my bookshelf for nearly a year before I was in the right frame of mind to approach this innovative work, and that was after I read "The sacred and the profane". This earlier and broader work sets out many of the same themes, but everything is worth reading several times over. The writing style is a somewhat archaic, but I found it accessible with a little effort - and what rewards await the patient reader! Eliade's erudition is breathtaking but never overbearing. His explanation of the "burden of history", and the "premodern" and modern responses to it, is truly elegant and helped me to understand in a new way the fundamental differences between Western (monotheistic) and Eastern religions - and why Westerners practising Buddhism or Daoism (for example) have difficulty experiencing the "eternal present". The implication, as I see it, is that the pressure of history gradually obliterates the premodern way of experiencing sacredness. I suspect this is a subtle form of historicism, which Eliade rejects, and I'm not sure I agree with his conclusion that "Christianity is the religion of modern man and historical man". Fifty years after Eliade wrote this book, Christianity is looking rather feeble in the face of dominant materialism and vaguely psychologically-based "new age" philosophies. Independent spiritual practitioners reading this book, however, might be inspired to question the dominant myth of progress and live a more immanent spirituality. This book certainly deserves a wide audience and a lively debate.