Absolutely NOT recommended for anyone coming fresh to the mixed-up field of JFK assassination theorising. This dense (actually, impenetrable) collection of essays is worryingly reminiscent of Graham Hancock's ancient-civilisations books: typically, we're shown a blurry JPEG, told what we ought to see in it, then spend the next half-hour trying, and usually failing, to see whatever the hell it is the writer says he (and 99 times out of a hundred it'll be a "he") sees. Unpalatable fact, which the authors in "Murder In Dealey Plaza" won't face: the majority of the evidence, medical and otherwise, in the JFK case was so ineffieicntly collected, collated and stored, you can make it "prove" almost anything. Or - as in this case - virtually nothing. Saying QED over and over again doesn't necessarily make it so. You have to argue your theory, and prove it to the general satisfaction. Very few of the contributors here manage to do either one of these things.
If there are salient facts in MIDP (and there may be, I guess), they get totally lost amidst the general confusion and misguided pedantry. This book needed much, much better editing, ideally by someone without so many preconceived notions. Two stars, then, more in sorrow than in anger.