FREE Delivery in the UK on orders with at least £10 of books.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Muhammad (Past Masters) has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Expedited shipping available on this book. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Muhammad (Past Masters) Paperback – 9 Dec 1999

4 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£4.41 £1.60
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£8.99 FREE Delivery in the UK on orders with at least £10 of books. In stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Muhammad (Past Masters)
  • +
  • The Koran: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
Total price: £13.98
Buy the selected items together

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.

Product details

  • Paperback: 112 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press, U.S.A.; Reprint edition (9 Dec. 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0192876058
  • ISBN-13: 978-0192876058
  • Product Dimensions: 19.7 x 0.8 x 12.9 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 451,666 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description


a moving introduction to the prophet and a very necessary one (Listener)

About the Author

Michael Cook is a Professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University. He is the author of several books on the history of the Middle East.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
First Sentence
The Muslim world extends continuously from Senegal to Pakistan, and discontinuously eastwards to the Philippines. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
One of the best on this subject for balance and frankness. Prose occasionally rather opaque.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
This is a very short book that could be read in one seat, yet it contains substantial information about Muhammad's life, teachings and politics. Michael Cook draws both from traditional Muslim sources (such as the "Sira" of Ibn Ishaq and, obviously, the Koran) and from modern criticism.
I particularly enjoyed Chapter 2, a concise presentation of the traditional account of Muhammad's life, as opposed to other chapters where the author attempts to question the historical reliability of the traditional sources.
Comment 2 of 7 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) HASH(0x9780a66c) out of 5 stars 15 reviews
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x9603c204) out of 5 stars The best short book on this subject that I have seen 1 Sept. 2003
By Roger Green - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I have been a serious student of the history of western religions for 5 or 6 years, with emphasis on the beginnings and early years of Christianity in the context of the cultures, philosophies and religions of the time (Jewish, Greek, Roman, Persian etc.), and the subsequent development of the 6th-7th century world in which Islam arose and flourished. I have accumulated a sizable reference collection and thought I hadn't missed very much. But I just ran across Michael Cook's 'Muhammad', and it is the book I would recommend that any interested beginner read for a short account of Muhammed and the origins of Islam. Only 89 pages, it is especially good on the relationships between Islam and its Arabian cultural roots, and between Islam and Judaism & Christianity. The writing style is so clear and effective that it took my breath away more than once. Other reviewers here criticize it as an apology for Islam, as speculating things that are in dispute, and as not being the best source on this subject. The first says less about this book or about Islam than it does about the reviewer. The second is true but trivial - Cook is clear that he is speculating when he does and it is a strength of this book that he is willing to. From my extensive reading, there is nothing in his speculations that is unreasonable. On the third, there are other good introductory books such as Karen Armstrong's 'History of God' and 'Islam', but this is the best well-written short treatment I have seen. Cook wrote a short, clear book in part by leaving out all the "maybes" and "so-and-so doesn't agree with this theory" verbiage. If you want a longer, every question & detail covered, a struggle to get through, reference-style treatment, well, they're out there. That's not what this is.
19 of 25 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x95ec31c8) out of 5 stars A Man and His Times 13 Jun. 2002
By studentofislamichistory - Published on
Format: Paperback
This book is not a biography of Muhammad; the Prophet's life is covered only in Chapter 2. It is rather an account of Muhammad in his historial context, with emphasis on pre-Islamic Arabia, the traditions of monotheism, and the sources for early Islamic history on which it is based.
The main flaw in this book is that it presents as authoritative information which is in reality quite controversial. For example, his chapter on Muhammad's life includes a brief phrase about the satanic verses incident (without calling it that) that fails to describe differing points of view on the subject. The whole chapter on the Prophet's life, and much of the rest of the book, has perhaps also been too much influences by anti-Semitism in the Middle East arising after the founding of Israel. He also reports lots of traditions outside the mainstream (such as Ishmaelite Arabs who followed Jewish law) without giving a clear indication of how they might have fit into the larger scheme of things.
His chapter on "The Sources," while perhaps the most controversial, does give a fair presentation of the dilemma scholars face as to whether the Islamic tradition about the Prophet is fundamentally correct or fundamentally a later invention. I disagree with his conclusion, but it's his book. Here he presents enough of the evidence for interested readers to make up their own minds.
Given the contraints of this series, Cook may have done all he could. This is an interesting work, but there are probably better ones out there.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
By Steven H Propp - Published on
At the time this book was published in 1983, Michael Cook was a lecturer "at the School of Oriental and African Studies in the University of London, (and) the author or editor of several books on the history of the Middle East."

He wrote in the Preface, "My own reservations about writing this book arise from different grounds. Muhammad made too great an impact on posterity for it to be an easy matter to place him in his original context... The result is that the only aspect about the book about which I feel no qualms is the brevity imposed by the format of the series. The attempt to write about Muhammad within such a compass has brought me to confront issues I might not otherwise have faced..."

Here are some additional quotations from the book:

"As might be expected, the Jesus of the Koran is still recognizable as the Jesus of the New Testament... There are, however, divergences. For no obvious reason the Koran insists that Jesus was not really crucified... But the crucial point of divergence is the insistence that Jesus, though a messenger of God, was not His son, still less God Himself." (Pg. 32-33)
"We may end this account with a brief relation of the future course of history as it appeared to early Muslims... The Muslim community will break up into a mass of conflicting sects... Eventually God will send a redeemer... This redeemer, the Mahdi, will receive allegiance at the sanctuary in Mecca, whence his emigration (hijra) will be to Jerusalem; there he will reign in justice... Thereafter the Antichrist (the Dajjal) will appear from Iraq, reducing the Muslims to a remnant... In the hour of their need, Jesus will descend to earth in armour and lead them against Antichrist..." (Pg. 41)
"There is a rich body of traditions as to how the Koran was collected and edited... the traditions are not a model of consistency. We learn that some of Muhammad's followers already knew the whole Koran by heart in his lifetime---yet subsequently it had to be pieced together out of fragments collected from here and there." (Pg. 67)
"The results of this research can perhaps be summarized as follows: First, nothing resembling the Koran as such is to be found in any other tradition; the book remains sui generis, and if it had predecessors, we know nothing of them." (Pg. 78)
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x96bff270) out of 5 stars A telling study of Muhammad 11 Mar. 2015
By M. A. Seifter - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Michael Cook's brief biography of Muhammad meets all the criteria of a fine, insightful analysis, worthy of repeated readings. I had first come across it in a graduate school seminar on "Muhammad and the origins of Islam" back in 1989, and I was immediately struck by its conciseness, its getting down to basics in narrating the life and historical fact of Muhammad. More, Cook adds on chapters putting Muhammad in historical and religious perspective of Middle Eastern monotheism, which cover the monotheist understanding of the universe, law, politics and history.Throughout, Cook's narrative and analysis makes splendid reading, and one gains significant insight by repeated re-readings. I would recommend this short book to anyone wishing to get a first orientation to Muhammad, Islam, and the Qu'ran.
HASH(0x95ec30cc) out of 5 stars Compelling yet perplexing work 12 Dec. 2015
By HH - Published on
Format: Paperback
This entry in the "Past Masters" series is captivating in its own right but also completely baffling in some respects. Part of the reason for this is the fact that Cook himself is a non-believer who not only doubts the authenticity of Muhammad's message but that of all monotheistic religions. According to Cook, all advanced civilizations of ancient times believed in polytheism, and the concept of monotheism arose among "conceptually less sophisticated people of the Near East, the Israelites" (p. 6). He goes on to assert that had the concept of monotheism remained the exclusive preserve of the Israelites: "[I]t would not have ranked as more than a curiosity in the history of the world at large" (p. 6). But Christianity emerged, eventually became a world religion, and spread the concept of monotheism in a vast region of the world. There is an almost nostalgic tone in Cook's narrative describing the demise of polytheism in the face of expanding Christianity.

It was Muhammad's ability to appropriate the concept of monotheism and alter it slightly to suit the local environment in Arabia, which is largely responsible for the emergence of the Arabs on the stage of history. According to Cook, Muhammad's genius is rooted in his ability to articulate a monotheistic message, contrast it with the polytheistic surroundings, propagate the message, and have the political acumen to outwit his opponents. Hence he was able to firmly implant the concept of monotheism among the Arabs who, Cook presumes, are less sophisticated than the ones among whom the concept originally emerged, the Israelites.

Cook's approach to discussing the career of Muhammad is quite original. He approaches the subject from the viewpoint of the monotheistic tradition at large. This is best illustrated by the titles of chapters 3-6: "The Monotheist Universe", "Monotheist History", "Monotheist Law", and "Monotheist Politics". Viewing the Prophet's career from this angle certainly does give one new insights into the significance of his message and life.

Consequently, the details of Muhammad's life do not receive extensive attention in Cook's book. The chapter dealing with Muhammad's biographical particulars is only thirteen pages long. The bulk of the book deals with the nature of Muhammad's monotheistic message, the manner in which he articulated it, and the methods he used to outmaneuver his opponents and eventually triumph. Along with his descriptive narrative of historical events, Cook liberally offers his personal insights into what could have been, what should have been, and what is, the hidden meaning behind a certain event or declaration of the Prophet. Many of these asides are very colorful, some of them even comical.

For the most part Cook refers to information and facts which have been widely accepted by the adherents of Islam, but at certain crucial junctures he resorts to citing obscurities and absurdities to illustrate a point. The opening paragraphs of chapter 4, "Monotheist History", are a case of such absurdities. The way Cook's narrative progresses one gets the unmistakable impression that most Muslims believe that the world is about 6000 years old, with some disagreement among some scholars. Even though it is an undeniable fact that certain Muslims in the past did estimate that the world was 6000 years old, these calculations have no basis in the Qur'anic narrative or the Prophetic tradition, and they certainly are not in any way a part of the Islamic orthodoxy. Why does Cook make an issue out of something which is not even remotely connected with the teachings of Muhammad and the belief system he advocated? His motives for having taken the trouble to go through such a discussion are quite dubious. There are a few other such dubious instances in the course of the book.

After finishing chapter seven entitled "The Sources", dealing with the sources of Islamic beliefs and law, one wonders if any of these sources are authentic and trustworthy. Beginning with the Qur'an, the primary source, Cook notes that the book "is strikingly lacking in structure" (p. 68). He goes on to note that in the Qur'an that "God may appear in the first and third persons in one and the same sentence, there may be omissions which, if not made good by interpretation, render the sense unintelligible; there are even what look like grammatical errors" (p. 68). These are very serious issues which Cook raises. The reader is left on his own to discover the cases of such "extraordinarily conservative editing", to use Cook's own words, because he does not provide any examples to illustrate his point. It is the height of intellectual cowardice to raise such controversial issues and offer no evidence to support one's position. Such an approach in academia is akin to a little child hurling insults at a perceived adversary. The second source for Islamic law and beliefs, the Tradition, is an even more flawed source than the Qur'an, according to Cook. He notes that there are many conflicting reports related to a single event in the Prophet's life. Additionaly, in the vast body of traditional narratives, it is often impossible to distinguish between "... genuine historical information and material that came into existence to explain the very Koranic passages that concern us" (p. 71). Here Cook goes into a lengthy discusson on the meaning, or the lack thereof, of ildf and rihlah to illustrate his point. I must admit I did not clearly see the relevance of this discussion to the issue at hand.

Cook states bluntly that the only reliable sources regarding the career of the Prophet are those which stand outside the Islamic tradition, which he labels "external evidence". He admits that some of this material can be traced back as early as CE 633-34, meaning after the Prophet's death, and most of it is from an even later time period. Cook is especially keen to focus on a few works in Greek, Syriac, and Armenian which refer to Muhammad's life, the authors of which are unknown to Cook or anyone else. But it can be said with certainty that none of these chroniclers could have known Muhammad personally or even been to the Arabian peninsula. It must be kept in mind that all non-Muslims were expelled from the peninsula long before most of these accounts were written. Some of the information contained in these sources contradicts some of the accepted data related to Muhammad's life. The fact that Cook prefers this "external evidence" and rejects the accepted sources speaks volumes about Cook as an academician. The data contained in these sources is far more suspect than the accepted sources.

Besides Cook's proclivity for accepting dubious sources upon which to base his research and opinion, there is even more direct evidence that he is hopelessly confused. This is especially evident in his concluding remarks, particularly his assertion that Judaism and Christianity are "profound pathos". In essence Cook says that the Islamic view of universe remains faithful to authentic reality, or to put it more bluntly the Islamic message is the "Truth". He reaches this conclusion after spending 88 pages doubting everything from the sources on which Islam is based, to the stability of Muhammad's psyche, and even the validity of a monotheistic worldview. In the face of such stupendous contradictions one has to doubt not only the methods used by the author to reach his conclusions, but the conclusion themselves. Because if his conclusion about Islam is correct there has to be a more sound method to arrive at it. Similarly his assertion the Judaism and Christianity represent "profound pathos" should also be categorically rejected, because the method used to reach the conclusion is no different than the one used in the case of Islam.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know