Mr Mee waltzes between three narratives. The stories of Mr Mee, a geriatric Candide unloosed on the Internet, a dying lecturer obsessed with Proust, Rousseau and one of his students, and the double-act antics of Ferrand and Minard, two eighteenth century copyists who appear briefly in Book X of Rousseau's Confessions, are woven together with considerable skill and undeniable charm. Throughout all three narratives shimmers the elusive Rosier's Encyclopaedia, a mammoth Borgesian work that claims, among other philosophical pirouettes, to disprove the existence of the universe. The novel is often delightfully funny, especially during Mr Mee's unwitting encounters with the seedier side of the twentieth century, but is most remarkable for the intellectual caprice of the mysterious encyclopaedia. For example, in one section machines are extrapolated from poems, according to the balance, weight and rhythm of the lines; then, the process is reversed and poems are discovered in the arrangement of inanimate objects. One of the joys of the novel is its examination of how what we think of as 'history' passes the majority of us by: as one character puts it "the 'swinging sixties' was in reality something which always seemed to be happening elsewhere, to other, more fashionable people'. Many of the concerns of Crumey's previous novels are revisited: the use of technology, the Enlightenment philosophes, the nature of chance and paradox; engagingly expressed through metafictions. Despite the scientific verve and literary allusions, this novel of ideas is certainly not a soulless machine or superficial game. Perhaps the most haunting section concerns the lecturer's childlessness, and Crumey conveys the way in which the couple fill their lives with seemingly banal concerns in order to stave off thinking about their lack with subtlety and poignancy. Language as a means to conceal as much as a means to communicate suffuses the novel, along with the sense that the technological advances in the methods of communication matter less than whether or nor one has something to say. Crumey dissects with clarity both the inarticulate moment and the necessity of articulation.