I saw Benny Goodman play in person in 1967. The first half of the program was the Weber Clarinet Concerto (which he never recorded); the second half was the Goodman quartet and sextet with Teddy Wilson and Gene Krupa. I absolutely loved his warm yet penetrating tone, even more beautiful in person than it was on the old 78s. Then I heard this recording of the Mozart concerto on LP and was enchanted all over again.
Over the years, however, I have had arguments with clarinet students over the "correctness" or "aptness" of Benny's playing in classical. They hate his tone, call it either thin or woody (depending on how much they hate him), but I have heard many many "correct" clarinetists since and have always found their tones to be chilly and cold. I'm sorry, but I don't appreciate an icy-sounding clarinet tone. I'm too spoiled by Johnny Dodds, Jimmy Noone, Artie Shaw, Ed Hall and Benny to put up with that! (Just as no classical trombonist can compete with Tommy Dorsey, Britt Woodman, Lawrence Brown, Jack Teagarden or J.J. Johnson!)
I admit that Benny fluffs a few notes, especially in the first movement. Recording classical music was always nerve-wracking for Goodman: on the famous Toscanini performance of "Rhapsody in Blue," Benny the perfectionist cracks the top note, and playing with Charles Munch and the Boston Symphony was bound to be somewhat uncomfortable for him. But the bottom line is not "how technically perfect is Goodman?" but rather, "how does the music sound?" And to my ears the music sounds damn fine. I have a legitimate classical clarinetist, Robert Oppenheim, playing the quintet with the Budapest String Quartet on Columbia, and though I like that version very much it is only because the Budapest quartet is more "together" than the Boston Symphony Quartet heard here, not because Oppenheim plays that much better than Benny Goodman.
So stop griping and just enjoy it, for crying out loud!!!!!