I simply could not believe how poor this book was and kept going with it in the hope it would improve, until I hit about p 130 (half way). Then I'd definitely had enough. The previous reviewer is quite right - the language is appalling and conceptually it is no more than an average regurgitation of all the usual arguments about 'the modern' and the nature of modernity. Yes, it is arranged a little differently and has tried to present a thematic as opposed to chronological, 'ism'-based perspective. Unfortunately, however, no clear rationale for this structure emerges; nor does any coherent argument.
Having read this immediately after T J Clark's 'Painting of Modern Life', I can think of no greater contrast. For all its faults, Clark's work is erudite, critically-based and beautifully written. How a respectable academic publisher like OUP comes to publish a text like this (it almost seems to have missed the proof-reading stage!) is quite beyond me. At one point, the author states that the impact of the closure of the Louvre during the First World War was 'in some ways as devastating as the war itself' - what on earth can his understanding of WW1 be! An extraordinary statement, and revelatory of the values underpinning the text. The subtitle mystifies too: this book has little of critical value to say about 'representation' and next to nothing about 'capitalism'.
The best bit about this work - hence the two stars - is the selection and high quality of the images, some of which are extremely interesting and which I have not come across elsewhere. Much could potentially have been done with such exciting material. Utterly disappointing.