- Paperback: 152 pages
- Publisher: University of Chicago Press (17 Aug 2001)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0226965325
- ISBN-13: 978-0226965321
- Product Dimensions: 20.4 x 13.5 x 1.3 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,293,597 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
On November 25, 1970, Japan's most renowned postwar novelist, Yukio Mishima, stunned the world by committing ritual suicide. Here, Marguerite Yourcenar, a brilliant reader of Mishima and a scholar with an eye for the cultural roles of fiction, unravels the author's life and politics: his affection for Western culture, his family and his homosexuality, his brilliant writings, and his carefully premeditated death.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
It is always difficult to judge a great contemporary writer: we lack the proper distance. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
It is always difficult to judge a great contemporary writer: we lack the proper distance. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Yourcenar explains the works of Mishima by showing
his taste for both western and typically Japanese
literature. She also provides explanation of the historical background, which is necessary to understand Mishima's political view.
Finally, it is a mere pleasure to read that book because it is clear and accurate at the same time.
his taste for both western and typically Japanese
literature. She also provides explanation of the historical background, which is necessary to understand Mishima's political view.
Finally, it is a mere pleasure to read that book because it is clear and accurate at the same time.
Format:Paperback
Marguerite takes a poetic analysis of Mishima's translated work and wends her way to find meaning to his ability to communicate across the continents, years and emotional currencies.
Although she aims to steer a course away from pop psychology the problem for any analysis is that it requires some intimate knowledge of psychology to begin to pick up the pieces. It is akin to an archeologist digging up the past with no sense of history.
This book is insightful nevertheless much could be made of Mishima in relation to Margaret Mahler's theories of individuation; the psychological birth of the infant. R D Laing's theories of elucidation and double bind could unravel his love stories.Transactional analysis could explain his life scripts; suicide was written backwards at 2 and became part of the mythology. Living appears in Confessions, marital subterfuge in Forbidden Colours, raw basic love in Confessions and Wave. Upon these foundations Mishima's genius shines. Not that he can be reduced to psychological theories alone but he can enlighten them and push the world into further extremes of self knowledge. Just as he did in real life.
Mishima admired Marguirete and she wrote eloquently of him. This is an analysis of his prose, plays and short stories and provides background ideas to his thought.
The comlexity of Mishima unravels throughout.
Although she aims to steer a course away from pop psychology the problem for any analysis is that it requires some intimate knowledge of psychology to begin to pick up the pieces. It is akin to an archeologist digging up the past with no sense of history.
This book is insightful nevertheless much could be made of Mishima in relation to Margaret Mahler's theories of individuation; the psychological birth of the infant. R D Laing's theories of elucidation and double bind could unravel his love stories.Transactional analysis could explain his life scripts; suicide was written backwards at 2 and became part of the mythology. Living appears in Confessions, marital subterfuge in Forbidden Colours, raw basic love in Confessions and Wave. Upon these foundations Mishima's genius shines. Not that he can be reduced to psychological theories alone but he can enlighten them and push the world into further extremes of self knowledge. Just as he did in real life.
Mishima admired Marguirete and she wrote eloquently of him. This is an analysis of his prose, plays and short stories and provides background ideas to his thought.
The comlexity of Mishima unravels throughout.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
6 reviews
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful
I should have listened to the previous two reviewers
25 May 2004
Format:Paperback
As a fan of Mishima Yukiyos work, I hoped that the other two reviwers of this book were mistaken, perhaps close minded, or otherwise wrong. However, they are right on target. Part biography and part "literary analysis", the book does neither well. The first half of the book is almost exclusively summaries of Mishima's major novels, with lengthy qoutes and plot summaries with no serious analysis. As a reader I get the feeling that Yourcenar wishes to bath in the literary sucess of Mishima by retelling his novels. I would be willing to forgive the first half of the book if the second had contained sharp, clear analysis. Instead the book makes wild claims with no support (I particularly enjoyed the line to the effect of "Confessions of a Mask describes all young people in Japan between 15 and 25 after world war 2"). The Sea of Fertility - Mishima's masterpiece - recieved a page of discussion after a length plot summary.
Since I didn't listen to the other reviewers, I hope others will.
20 of 28 people found the following review helpful
Not very good.
25 Mar 2003
Format:Paperback
This book is of little value to both Mishima fans and novices. The novices will want biographical information, of which Yourcenar gives precious little - sure, all the really important stuff is there, but it's outlined in a very sketchy, couldn't-be-bothered way - and certainly far less than either John Nathan or Henry Scott-Stokes. The fans will want information that isn't available anywhere else, of which there is none whatsoever in this book. So what does Yourcenar talk about? The literature, primarily. That would be good, if not for one thing - Yourcenar is an author herself, and she seems to be out to prove her own literary worth. Thus, the book is made of torturedly "sophisticated" sentences, bizarre assertions of the nature of "those who love life love death the most" (not an exact quote, but a very accurate paraphrase), and of course, some namedropping. Yourcenar mentions D'Annunzio, Cocteau, Lautreamont, and others, with very little cause. She also knocks down a few straw men here and there (randomly, in one footnote, she spontaneously accuses nameless people of accusing Mishima of being a snob, and proceeds to prove them wrong), and once proudly proclaims that Mishima was a reader of her own literary work. Bully for her, I guess.
The literary analysis really isn't that good, either. Admittedly, a cursory read may have the effect of helping people see why they like or dislike Mishima's writing, even if Yourcenar's own musings on the matter aren't very inspiring, but it really doesn't say anything. Some of the man's works are barely given a mention - the "discussions" of After the Banquet and The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With the Sea take up about a page, combined. Others are given whole chapters, but even then, there is little serious attempt at character analysis - for instance, Ying Chan, the doomed beauty of The Temple of Dawn, is described as "careless" or "thoughtless" or something to that effect, with no justification for this whatsoever, and no further attempt is made to understand her. The part dealing with The Decay of the Angel is effective, but only because it makes the reader remember that incredible novel - it is Mishima who is responsible for the effectiveness, and not Yourcenar.
So what's Yourcenar's point? Apparently, that Mishima had a special vision of a "Buddhist Void" unique to him that inscrutably exhorted him to commit suicide. That's about it. To this end, she gives probably a lot more attention than is necessary to some of Mishima's lesser, later political works - but almost none, paradoxically, to his essay Sun and Steel. This is why she glosses over biographical details - because in her opinion, they have little to no bearing on Mishima's life. A few anecdotes, such as the "green snake" incident, are related with much self-conscious weightiness, as if they held some kind of magical key to Mishima's work. All of these anecdotes are also related by either Nathan or Scott-Stokes in their respective biographies with much less sophomoric interpretations. Yourcenar continues with a rhapsodic summary of the story "Patriotism," which has no value to any reader who has read the source material, and only ends up conveying the impression that Yourcenar is far more fond of blood and death than Mishima ever was. She ends with a poetization of Mishima's last day, in which she waxes eloquent and ecstatic on the subject of ritual disembowelment and decapitation. This culminates in the last paragraph of the book, a completely unnecessary and grotesque extended metaphor that says nothing and isn't even worth reading.
When the book doesn't make goofy conclusions from its superficial collection of facts, it resorts to just praising Mishima's work. On this there is no argument from me, as I am a big fan of Mishima and agree wholeheartedly with Yourcenar's praise. However, her book contributes nothing new to the exciting field of praise, either. Truth be told, I have a hard time understanding why this book was even written. At 150 pages, it's barely even a book; it fails as a biography and as literary criticism. Even at its best, it just isn't very good; you'd do much, much better with either of the two primary Mishima biographies.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Is it a biography? Is it literary criticism? What is it?
25 Mar 2010
Format:Paperback
Having recently finished Spring Snow, which perked in me a keen interest in learning more about Yukio Mishima, I made the mistake of picking up the first book about the author that I came upon, which happened to be this slender volume. Granted, given the size of the book, I didn't expect it to be the definitive biography of the man. But somehow this book managed to disappoint. It somehow failed to deliver on even my modest expectations.
The first problem is that I don't know exactly what the book is. It begins at the beginning of his life and ends with his death, yet it's not a biography. The author makes some interesting observations and provides some insight to a number of his books, but it's too inconsistently done, with a few sentences used to discuss some books and pages for others, to be considered literary criticism. It's sort of like an essay, ( I noticed after I finished reading it that the dust jacket claims it's an essay) yet it doesn't have a premise, or at least not a firm one, and doesn't end with a conclusion other than Mishima's death. So the result is that I never really felt grounded in this book.
Further, sometimes her writing is annoying, like when she lectures us about fascism in the West, (displaying either a lack of historical education or a skewed interpretation based on political biases) or when she tells us Mishima liked one of her novels.
I won't say I hated it as much as other reviewers, because given the subject, there were points in the book that interested me. But next time when I want to read a biography, I'll go right to the authoritative ones.
The first problem is that I don't know exactly what the book is. It begins at the beginning of his life and ends with his death, yet it's not a biography. The author makes some interesting observations and provides some insight to a number of his books, but it's too inconsistently done, with a few sentences used to discuss some books and pages for others, to be considered literary criticism. It's sort of like an essay, ( I noticed after I finished reading it that the dust jacket claims it's an essay) yet it doesn't have a premise, or at least not a firm one, and doesn't end with a conclusion other than Mishima's death. So the result is that I never really felt grounded in this book.
Further, sometimes her writing is annoying, like when she lectures us about fascism in the West, (displaying either a lack of historical education or a skewed interpretation based on political biases) or when she tells us Mishima liked one of her novels.
I won't say I hated it as much as other reviewers, because given the subject, there were points in the book that interested me. But next time when I want to read a biography, I'll go right to the authoritative ones.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
