Found the book in a used book store located in a small town, and bought it for $3.50, in early October 2009.
The book answered at least one of my burning questions: What brands of make-up did Michael Jackson wear? Page 253-254 (soft cover 1995 edition) says: "After affixing his false eyelashes, he always applied the same cosmetic brands: Fashion Fair, Honey Glow, and Lancome eye shadow, mascara, and eyeliner."
I am wondering how the D.A.'s office got an acquittal on Mr. Jackson if the witnesses and events detailed in this book are accurate. Even if these witnesses were paid-off by Mr. Jackson, would not the truth prevail on the strength of the facts in this book if it was based on pure facts? I guess, I need to find out what really happened between 2003 and 2005 (the second time the charges came around and the criminal trial) in order to figure out what the material in this book is about. But, the acquittal does not give this book much credibility or credence as it stands, at this point in time. Furthermore, I don't know of any further allegations made with respect to Mr. Jackson and child molestation.
Note: An acquittal means that a Defendant was found "not guilty" based on the evidence presented at trial. Theoretically, a Defendant can be guilty although the evidence adduced at trial did not lead to a guilty verdict. But, once acquitted, the person cannot be deemed whatever the charges were such as murderer if the person was charged for murder. I believe it is defamatory to call a person "murderer" if he or she was acquitted of such charges.
But, who's going to sue for defamation-Michael Jackson is dead. Well, anyone with legal standing associated with his Estate or Trust, such as trustees, special administrators, guardians, and beneficiaries, can bring lawsuits. But, I am not a lawyer, so please check this out this info for yourself.