The controversial title of this book, which owes something to a Zen master, reacts to something that has been like a millstone around the neck of the Church of England parish clergy for many years. Often judged in relation to their predecessors there is also the romantic example of George Herbert who served for less than three years in the parishes of Fugglestone with Bemerton in the 1630's and who wrote lovely poetry. In the twentieth century Herbert was held up as the ideal of the devoted parish priest even as it became more impossible to live up to the role.
Justin Lewis-Anthony, a youngish parish priest from the Liberal Catholic wing of the Church of England offers a way out of what he sees as an outmoded pattern of ministry. He sketches George Herbert's life and then surveys the story of the busy parish priest quoting a number of 20th century self-help manuals along the way. He sees this model of the priest as `phulaxal' rather like a wicket keeper, handing out the jobs and keeping the show on the road. The priest is the paid volunteer who somehow ends up running everything and is consequently seen by the world at large as `The Church', or in its strictest sense `the vicar' doing it on behalf of everyone else. The vicar is then reduced to being `nice' which leads to a consideration of ministerial burnout. This struck many chords with me as one who has struggled with the George Herbert model for more than thirty years without succumbing to burnout.
The central section of the book sees the priest as Witness, Watchman and Weaver with a chapter devoted to each. This is based on a lecture by Archbishop Rowan Williams which in turn reflects on Michael Ramsey's classic "The Christian Priest Today". Lewis-Anthony draws heavily on the writings of Hauerwas, Richard Neibuhr and Bonhoeffer in this. I have to confess to finding this part of the book a bit dense.
The final section looks at the `KGH' (Killing George Herbert) priest with regard to Rule, Role, Responsibility, Reckoning and Reconciling. Rule in this case means `Rule of Life' rather than ruling the roost. I found this part of the book quite helpful; Lewis-Anthony points to the work of John Truscott and to models of `Getting Things Done'. He places Prayer first but for me he does not quite resolve the tension between `Being' and `Doing' when most of the doing can be done better or at least as well by the non-ordained. The author's Rule of Life which he appends seems to be every bit as exhaustive and exhausting as some of the self-help manuals he has criticised earlier and leaves me asking "How does he fit all this in to one week?" I would, incidentally, rather aspire to being a `PGH' (Post George Herbert) priest.
In short, this is a thought provoking book written in a racy and anecdotal style (the outer sections at least) that challenges many orthodoxies without completely replacing them.