Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong: A Guide for Young Thinkers and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Trade in Yours
For a 0.79 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Start reading Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong: A Guide for Young Thinkers on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong [Paperback]

Dan Barker , Brian Strassbourg , Brian Strassburg
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
RRP: 16.99
Price: 9.00 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over 10. Details
You Save: 7.99 (47%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 23 Aug.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition 7.40  
School & Library Binding --  
Paperback 9.00  
Trade In this Item for up to 0.79
Trade in Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong for an Amazon Gift Card of up to 0.79, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Book Description

19 July 1992 0879757310 978-0879757311
This captivating book affirms a child's ability to think, to seek information, and to question "why?"

Children should be given information, not dogma, and tools for critical thought, not holy books, asserts Dan Barker. Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong teaches children important humanistic ideas. Andrea, the book's main character, distinguishes between rules and principles, finds that there is not always a "right" thing to do, and realizes that sometimes the "right" thing is to choose the lesser "wrong." Her most important insight: Regardless of one's own beliefs, you should respect everybody's human rights. Through Andrea, Barker painlessly teaches "situation ethics" to children.

Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong doesn't speak down to kids, but uses simple language and fun illustrations to make a tough topic understandable.

Frequently Bought Together

Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong + Maybe Yes, Maybe No: A Guide for Young Skeptics + Evolution Revolution
Price For All Three: 30.68

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Paperback: 76 pages
  • Publisher: Prometheus Books UK (19 July 1992)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0879757310
  • ISBN-13: 978-0879757311
  • Product Dimensions: 21.3 x 13.9 x 0.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 884,570 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4 star
3 star
2 star
3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars As the book cover says... 4 Feb 2008
"Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong affirms a child's ability to think, to seek information, and to ask "Why?" By using factually based information and the tools of critical thought, without recourse to dogma or holy books, the book's main character, Andrea, learns vital moral lessons. Her most important insight: Regardless of one's own beliefs, you should respect everybody's human rights. Through fun illustrations and an engaging narrative, Maybe Right, Maybe Wrong communicates to children on their level important principles of moral choice."

Every child should read this simple book that explains how to make decisions on your behaviour following moral principles. A vital step in teaching them to think for themselves, question the authority of rules and behave as a moral, fulfilled member of society.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
5.0 out of 5 stars a great read 24 Jun 2013
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
You've got to read this book and maybe yes maybe no they are great books by Dan barker great books
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 7 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Rip-off 21 Feb 2009
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
I find that the 9 I have been charged by Amazon for this book which is more like a brochure is completely unjustified.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 4.1 out of 5 stars  18 reviews
192 of 201 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book for freethought households 16 Oct 2000
By Gilker Kimmel - Published on
Amongst all the WWJD, religion equals morality, preaching stands Dan Barker, willing to say, "Yes, there is such a thing as morality and, no, there's no need to buy into superstition to understand it." Barker never talks down to kids nor does he try to pass off the old shell game of pretending that morality is simply a matter of following someone else's rules.
I highly recommend this book for children of freethinkers and anyone else who prefers rationality to dogma.
167 of 176 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Teaches Moral Principles rather than laws 28 Dec 2000
By A Customer - Published on
Teaches young people how to be Good, not through obeying laws and rules without thought, but by remembering certain principles ("do not hurt others", "value life) and fitting them, through thought, to situations. A wonderful answer to the idea that people can't be moral without god and government.
71 of 75 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Good for undoing religious brainwashing 9 Dec 2006
By Jennifer D. O'guin - Published on
I bought this book for my son, who was raised by my dad down south, in the bible belt. To say my son was brainwashed would be putting it mildly. I'm not sure how much the book did, but he's becoming more normal every day, and is now starting to be able to make his own decisions based on his own feelings of guilt and his own moral code, rather than having to ask himself "what would jesus do". I read the book myself, and though very basic and maybe a 2nd-3rd grade reading level, I thought it made some excellent points, and it made me think... no small matter for a book of such a low reading level! I highly recommend it to any agnostic or pagan parents trying to teach their children the true meaning of right and wrong, without the guilt of a higher being being used as an intimidation and scare tactic to twist the child into submission. This book should help to develop the free thinking skills that are required for any child to be happy and have good self-esteem in regards to their choices and actions.
41 of 45 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Great Concept, Poor Execution 27 Jan 2011
By goonius - Published on
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
The beginning of this book - and the part I had access to via the preview function - starts out well enough. We are introduced to Andrea, and immediately to a situation where she determines that fighting solves nothing. It then jumps to a hypothetical situation of Andrea's cat being hit by a car and we are walked through Andrea's struggle between two concepts she knows to be right and realizing that they can't both apply to the situation. Should her cat be 'put to sleep' and spared inevitable pain or kept alive, suffering, in an effort to delay inevitable death. Before Andrea makes her choice, the question is offered, aptly, to the reader. Then next page shows Andrea choosing the difficult but most logical choice -- to end her cat's life, and thus, his suffering. I found this portion of the book to be precisely what I expected in terms of reader interaction and the promotion of free thought the book is supposed to be based upon.

The question regarding Andrea's cat posed on page 20 of the 76-page book, is essentially the last real thought-inducing question posed to the reader. Allow me to express my surprise here, as I believed that this book would gently guide its reader to conclusions, rather than stating them outright.

There are some pages following this discourse which discuss the concept of morality and there being 'good people who do believe in god(s)' and 'good people who do not believe in god(s).' Appropriate enough.

Then it jumps into small segments of 'do and don't' lists, ie. 'Do be fair.' or 'Don't cheat' and most of these have little follow-ups on the 'why' of explaining the reason these are or are not things we should do. I honestly expected more. As in, I expected that rather than laying down a bunch of adult concepts spelled out in simple kid language, that the adult concepts would be geared toward a kid audience on a kid-level while still maintaining their core ideas.

Perhaps the following example will demonstrate this fairly succinctly. On page 48, addressing the topic of honesty it gives this example: "Suppose a woman you know comes to your home and says she needs somewhere to hide because her husband has been beating her up." Huh? Really? Because dozens of 5 year olds are running their own covert battered women's shelters?

I begin to question, with that last example, what age audience this is supposed to be geared toward. On one hand, the illustrations and tone of the writing seem quite well matched to an early grade-school child. It is written in simply-worded text that my five year old daughter could easily read herself (though I certainly intended to read it over with her first). But when you touch on a prickly topic like battered women, something that hopefully most children will not have to encounter, you open up some rather uncomfortable possibilities. The one that comes to my mind is my daughter going to school and telling her teacher than if daddy ever beats mommy, she won't tell him where mommy is. Parents out there may grasp why this would be an undesirable outcome of broadening their child's mind..... For children who have already encountered real-world domestic abuse, I think it's fair to say they have bigger fish to fry than pondering whether providing shelter to battered women whilst being honest with the husband is the moral high ground. The subject matter is too mature and could have been better chosen given the potential age group.

Moving on.

Later, on page 57, the Golden Rule is addressed. I'm quite fond of the Golden Rule and its endless applications. As I understand it, in its most common form, states "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Barker has a different take on it and says it means, "Some people are kind to others because they want to be treated the same way themselves." That's actually a quite different thing. Amazing how you can change words around ever so slightly and convey an entirely different concept. Barker goes on to demonstrate this glaring difference by saying, "But other people are kind because they think human beings are valuable, not because they want a reward." I find this perplexing. Perhaps I've gone my whole life interpreting the phrase "as you would have them do unto you" incorrectly, but I always believed that you treated others the way you would ideally like to be treated -- though that may not necessarily be the way they actually treat you in return. It's a form of empathy, you know? One that comes from the most valid source of logical data one has for interpersonal relations - their own interpretation of how the actions of others effect them. If an action effects you negatively, then you should not visit that action upon another being (human or otherwise). Which, going back to the initial scenario, could have easily been the logic for euthanizing the pet cat. If your death were inevitable and you were suffering greatly, would you choose euthanasia or would you prolong your life, suffering, dignity beyond reason? I would have euthanized the cat because I would ideally hope that another would use their own insight to do the same for me in a similar situation. I would still euthanize the cat, even if someone chose not to euthanize me were the tables turned, because my moral compass is internal and greatly based on my experience of personal pain and suffering and the experience of watching others needlessly endure it. That is all to say, I find the section on the Golden Rule to be off- perhaps influenced by a negative connotation with its general association with religion?

This book is presented and titled as being a guide for young thinkers. But as I got progressively further into the book, it seemed to be laying out a sort of moral dogma, with little justification, and requiring little thought and contemplation from the reader. Dogmatic presentations of moral thinking are precisely what I believed the book was created to counter, and I feel it fell flat. This is even more sad because on each and every page I can see the author's *intention* and then as he carries that good idea along he almost seems to trip himself up on it and it just gets regurgitated on the page in ineffective form. By the end I felt that the ability to think your own way through it was rather squelched by the 'do and don't' tone it takes on.

I bought this book as part of a long-term plan to counter Christianity-based indoctrination that has been directed at my daughter. As an atheist of many years, I find it difficult to stand idly by and let her believe that what little she has been fed by religious infleunces represents the thinking of the entire world. I'm terribly disappointed to say I don't this will make its way into our 'Chrisitanity-unschooling' curriculum. Which is a shame, because I've looked extensively and can find nothing else like it.

I plan on returning this book. It will be my first book return on Amazon. But I feel our money could be better spent on educating our daughter about -- well anything. Mythology, eastern religions, philosophy, ethics, science and the cosmos.... There are a lot of paths to free thought. But this one, I believe, is too forward, too black-and-white, and not informative enough to be the optimal one.
47 of 53 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Stressing Reason Over Dogma-Mcmullen Should Take a Lesson 24 Dec 2004
By Gregory Ellis - Published on
This book is about a young girl, Andrea, who is learning how to make ethical decisions in a variety of situations by acquiring and learning how to use the tools of reason, rather than relying on arbitrary doctrines or dogma decided beforehand by authorities past or present, be it Prophets,
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category