| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £3.65
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Mathematical Logic (Dover Books on Mathematics) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £3.65, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Synopsis
This reprint of Kleene's 1967 text provides an elementary but thorough treatment of mathematical logic of the first order. Kleene (formerly: mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison) covers a variety of methods and techniques including model theory (truth tables), Hilbert-type proof theory, and proof theory through derived rules. Subsequent ch
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
7 reviews
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
Excellent Excellent Book
16 July 2008
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
This book was written by one of the great American mathematical minds of this century. I've read it cover to cover and it happens to be my favorite logic book for its scope, depth, and clarity. Kleene uses a combined model-theoretic and proof-theoretic approach, and derives many interesting results relating the two (he also gives mention to special axioms for Intuitionistic logic). Although his focus in the first part of the book is on a more or less mathematical treatment of standard first-order predicate logic (augmented later by functions and equality), he also spends considerable time discussing the ways in which formal logic can and should be used to analyze "ordinary language" statements and arguments. After setting the groundwork, he moves onto subjects such as set theory, formal axiomatic theories, turing machines and recursiveness, Godel's incompleteness theorem, Godel's completeness theorem, and just about every interesting subject relating to logic in the first half of the twentieth century.
For the mathematically inclined self-teacher, Kleene's exposition should not be difficult at all, in fact I found it remarkably clear compared to other mathematical treatments of the subject (which are necessary if one wants to understand the deeper results). I suppose less mathematically inclined readers could try Irving Copi's "Symbolic Logic" as a start, although even that requires some mathematical proficiency, and since it doesn't cover many of the things you will want to know about, you'll end up coming back to a book like Kleene's anyway. So to summarize, if you want to learn the hard stuff (from the first half of the twentieth century--which includes just about everything the layman/philosopher wants to know), there is no better or easier way.
For the mathematically inclined self-teacher, Kleene's exposition should not be difficult at all, in fact I found it remarkably clear compared to other mathematical treatments of the subject (which are necessary if one wants to understand the deeper results). I suppose less mathematically inclined readers could try Irving Copi's "Symbolic Logic" as a start, although even that requires some mathematical proficiency, and since it doesn't cover many of the things you will want to know about, you'll end up coming back to a book like Kleene's anyway. So to summarize, if you want to learn the hard stuff (from the first half of the twentieth century--which includes just about everything the layman/philosopher wants to know), there is no better or easier way.
44 of 61 people found the following review helpful
Not for the autodidact
19 July 2004
Format:Paperback
Ten years ago, I took an undergraduate course in symbolic logic. Wishing recently to refresh my (extremely rusty) memories of the propositional calculus and the first-order predicate calculus, I picked up this meaty text and was extremely dismayed to find myself soundly defeated within the first few pages. Kleene does not even make a pretense of holding the reader's hand: either you get it or you don't. There is nothing even remotely "user-friendly" about this book's presentation of its material.
If one were to read this book under the guidance of a teacher, I think it might be worthwhile. It may not be fair for me to blame the author for my inability to understand his writing. If you're smarter than I am, you might breeze right through it.
I cannot recommend this book, though, good though it may be, for anyone who wishes to teach him/herself logic, nor for anyone who wishes to brush up on the subject. There are exercises for the reader to test his/her understanding of the material, but no answer key is provided. This is heavy-duty stuff, and not well-suited to the self-teacher.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Still very usefull
21 April 2010
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
There are many books on logic, but this, written by one of the chief logicians of the 20th century, deserves a place on your bookshelf. The informations and the exposition style are solid, clear and still new to many. The author also explains the historical motivations for each new concept he talks about, and this alone should make up your mind about buying this book.
But I have seen more modern approaches, and maybe better ones. It's possible to learn so much from this book, and so much that you'll need no other book, least you'd prefer a contemporary way to talk about those things. I would not adopt it for my classes, but I strongly recommend it to my fellows.
But I have seen more modern approaches, and maybe better ones. It's possible to learn so much from this book, and so much that you'll need no other book, least you'd prefer a contemporary way to talk about those things. I would not adopt it for my classes, but I strongly recommend it to my fellows.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
