Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Materialism and Empirio-criticism: Critical comments on a reactionary philosophy Unknown Binding – 1977

1 customer review

See all 7 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£7.84
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
£46.80



Product details

  • Unknown Binding
  • Publisher: Moscow: Progress Publishers (1977)
  • ASIN: B0007AX25S
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 7,509,221 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

2.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Ashtar Command on 7 Jan. 2012
Format: Paperback
"Materialism and Empirio-Criticism" must be the most boring work ever written. My sympathies go to the poor Czarist censor-bureaucrat who had to sift through this book before it was published. I tried to read it three times, but never managed to do the same. (I suspect the censor was cheating, too.)

In a way, however, I also empathize with the author, V.I. Lenin himself. (The book is actually Lenin's philosophical magnum opus.) "Materialism and Empirio-Criticism" is an attack on the philosophy of Mach, Avenarius and some of their epigones. It can hardly be denied that the empirio-criticists were full of crap. Lenin must have felt a great amount of frustration when attempting to prove that, really guys, there is such a thing as a mind-independent world. The Machists had great trouble explaining where the mind-dependent world might have been before the emergence of humans. Was the world dependent for its existence on the mind of an ichtyosaurus, a worm, or what? And what if humanity would disappear? Would the world disappear with it? Et cetera. Poor Nikolai Lenin, being forced to argue such trivial points with a bunch of ivory tower intellectuals. I suppose he later got his revenge - and his own censors!

Still, those parts of the work I somehow managed to read, contain obvious contradictions. Lenin regards dialectical materialism as absolutely true, and opposed to both metaphysics and relativism. According to dialectical materialism, there is such a thing as absolute truth somewhere "out there". Humans can never fully grasp this absolute truth (presumably because humans are finite). What they can do, however, is to constantly come closer and closer to it. With this sleight of hand, Lenin solves the contradiction between abstract metaphysics and pure relativism.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Look for similar items by category


Feedback