I asked for this for Christmas and spent most of the Day buried in it. Unfortunately, as it's short, I soon finished it...and felt I'd had an insubstantial feast for quite a lot of money, as books go.
I enjoyed it - but I would have enjoyed it more, if there had been more of it.
Josephine Wilkinson suggests that Mary Boleyn's two children, Henry and Katharine Carey, were really Henry 8th's. She offers no new evidence to back this up, that I could see, or maybe too many mince pies made me nod off during that bit. She starts to go through conception dates, so you get interested - hmm, maybe she has a point, were Mary and Henry lovers during this time? - then she stops.
There has got to be more on this somewhere, surely. Come on, comb those obscure sources, please someone! Where is the comment of a Venetian ambassador - the Daily Mail of their time when it came to a good royal gossip?
Back to the book! She could also have explored in more detail, the fact that Anne Boleyn became the Carey children's guardian. You'd think those Boleyn sisters were one big happy family from this account, but still, I'd be wild if my sis stole my posh lover, adopted my children, and I had to curtsey to her.
Mary comes over as a warm-hearted person who valued love, from her last surviving letter about why she eloped with a man who was her social inferior on the grounds that he loved her when no one else did, really. What did poor Mary do, to become so rejected by the Boleyns after her first husband died? Whatever it was, it saved Mary's neck later, so she won out.
Josephine Wilkinson writes quite a lot in the passive tense. It is a common mistake that academics make, I think. I wish she would revise and enlarge her book. It is a pretty book to have on the shelf and there is a need for more work on Mary Boleyn.