| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Diappointment,
By
This review is from: The Man Who Left Too Soon: The Biography of Stieg Larsson (Hardcover)
I share much of the disappointnment which others have expressed above about this book. Barry Forshaw is an excllent commentator on contemporary crime fiction but it is his lack of political awareness, and left-wing politics in particular, which largely explains why he fails to draw out the unique qualities of Steig Larsson as a political crime writer. Forshaw comments inadequately on Larssen's polical background - the Vietnam War, Communist Party sympathies and finally the anti-fascist involvement. But none of this is woven into a sufficient political biography and yet it is that political biography which does so much to explain both the Milennium Trilogy and the writer's unique viewpoint. For example, there is no analysis of Stieg's shift from Stalinist politics to his predominant Trotskyist position if Forshaw even appreciates that distinction. Forshaw is not alone in that failing for no other commentary on the author, to my knowledge, has tackled that political development. But without that Forshaw is left to paint Larsson as a mere synthesis of Agatha Christie, Chandler and Scandinavian crime fiction (sadly without mentioning Jo Nesbo, the one other Scandinavian writer who comes anywhere near Steig in terms of a politicised crime fiction). Similarly Forshaw fails to draw on what was probably another major influence on the Trotskyist Larsson, the Pluto crime series of the 1970's and 1980's which produced a very fertile growth of new radical crime British crime fiction writers - Julian Rathbone and Sarah Dunant to mention only the two best known. I feel sure Steig would have come into contact with and been influenced by this series, though in the end he transcended it and every other influence quite brilliantly.
69 of 72 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Hardly a biography ...,
By J Whitgift "J Whitgift" (London) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Man Who Left Too Soon: The Biography of Stieg Larsson (Hardcover)
I had high hopes when I first opened Barry Forshaw's biography of Stieg Larsoon, not least the hope that it would enable me to know more about the author of the best selling Millennium Trilogy. This hope was, however, shattered very early on. Forshaw's book is not strictly a biography of Larsson (though it does contain a biographical interlude at the beginning of the book). Rather it is a book about the Millennium Trilogy and the part Larsson has played as its author - the book remains (and its franchise) remains the main focus of the book, Larsson's life remains merely an interlude to the main action.
What biographical detail there is in Forshaw's book is dealt with fairly swiftly, at the beginning of the book. We are given a brief outline of the trajectory of his life as a journalist and of the controversy which has surrounded his legacy as an author. However, the biographical detail is merely a sketch, designed to give an outline of his life, with no colour or detail. We are told, for instance that Larsson enjoyed his period of National Service, but are given no details of what form his service took or why he enjoyed it so much. We are also told that his relationship with his immediate family was not close, but no why it was not so. Such missed opportunities mean that we do not get a full picture of who Larsson was, just an impression and one that is subservient to his role as author of the Trilogy. It is, however, interesting to note that for Forshaw, Blomkvist (in particular his work ethic), can be viewed as Larsson writing himself as a charecter in his novel, and that he services as an image of how Larsson saw himself. Indeed, Larsson seems to have written himself into the text through Blomkvist. It would be unfair, however, to say that Blomkvist is Larsson, he is not, it is more a case of art imitating life. One could also argue that we learn more about Larsson from the Trilogy (via Blomkvist) than we do from Forshaw. As I noted above, this is a book about the Millennium Trilogy not Larsson. It deals with the Trilogy's franchise/ merhcandise - its reception in the UK/US and its translation from Swedish into English. The Trilogy itself is something of a zeitgeist novel - one which captures the popular imagination, and therefore the bestsellers lists. Other novels in this category include the Harry Potter novels (with their meta-narrative - Christian ethos) or the Dan Brown novels (with their emphasis on Gnostic knowledge/ secret histories). For the Trilogy, its meta-narrative(s) focus on women's' rights, the rights of the voiceless in Swedish society, human trafficking and Nordic fascism are all grist to Larsson's mill. (These are, of course, interests of Larsson - an anti-fascist, feminist socialist and investigative journalist, someone who had links with the far-left and the anti-fascist 'Searchlight Foundation' and magazine in the UK.) A good portion (almost two thirds) of the book is a retelling of the three Millennium novels, working through the finer details of the novels and reading between the lines to further explore and expand our knowledge of the books. To my mind, this retelling is somewhat superfluous, especially when one is looking for a biography of Larsson. For those who have already read the Trilogy, a further retelling may serve as a diversion away from the main question, 'Just who was Larsson? What made him tick? And what caused him to write the Trilogy?' and perhaps most importantly of all 'What is it about the Trilogy that has captured the attention of so many readers, not just in Northern Europe, but also Britain and increasingly the US?' (Questions which remain unanswered by this book.) What the book does do is throw up some interesting ideas which may not have occurred to the casual reader of the Trilogy. In particular the thesis that in Blomkvist and Salander, the traditional literary roles usually ascribed to male and female charecters, have been reversed. Salander takes on the traditional male roles (of thoughtful strength) more Blomkvist the female roles (he is impulsive, promiscuous - almost every girl falls for him and he uses this and them to his advantage). By challenging and reversing these traditional roles, and by turning them on their head, Larsson demonstrates his feminist credentials to good effect. (It is also refreshing to see this happen and I applaud Forshaw for highlighting this fact, which whilst obvious when highlighted, might otherwise have gone unnoticed.) Forshaw places the book within the context of Swedish literature, e.g. that of Henning Mankell. (Though one will have to look to other sources to understand who 'Pippi Longstocking' is and how she relates to Salander/ Blomkvist.) Again, Salander is described as being 'Sociopathic' (which makes sense in the context of the novels) but is not explored in any great detail giving the impression of supposition without supporting evidence. There is a good book here, and it has to be said that Forshaw is a very engaging writer, but it is also a book that needs expanding (and building upon). More importantly, there is a need for a good biography of Larsson in English (Kurdo Baski's biography of Larsson is due to be published in September 2010, but Forshaw has already cast doubt on the veracity of what Baski has written his own book.) Unfortunately this is not that biography, better wait to Sept 2010 to see what Baski's one brings.
31 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
disappointing,
By
This review is from: The Man Who Left Too Soon: The Biography of Stieg Larsson (Hardcover)
After reading the Millenium trilogy I was looking forward to reading about the author Stieg Larsson. Instead of reading a life story, I was treated to a summary of the three books, a list of scandanavian authors, and thier various opinions about Larsson's abilities as a writer. The final straw was a description of a tour of Stockholm which points out the locations that Larsson uses in his books.
There are a few facts about Larsson in this book, but not nearly enough to call it a biography. I have been left with the feeling that I have been ripped off.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|
|
|