Felix Youssoupov is rememberd for only one thing--the murder of the mystic, Rasputin, in 1916. He accomplished little else during his long and self-indulgent life save a major lawsuit against MGM. (The next time I see "Any resemblance between the characters and persons living or dead is purely coincidental", I'll think of the Prince's fortuitious suit which left him in the financial pink for the rest of his life.) Greg King's book on THE LAST EMPRESS was a stunning, beautifully researched book on a controversial figure. King had access to all of Alexandra's correspondence and also that of her friends and relatives. The same situation did not apply when he wrote about Felix Youssoupov, and this hurts the book. We have hints of scandal and sexual misbehaviour. There are lengthy descriptions of palaces and their contents since there is so little to say about the subject of this book.His only character traits appear to be vanity and frivolousness. He may have murdered Rasputin simply to gratify a vain urge to 'be part of history.' Other 'reasons' are suggested, and never proven. Youssoupov's relatives apparently did not cooperate with King and the prince's papers were unavailable. We are left with 'suppositions' and a great deal of third-person narrative. The Prince rarely speaks in his own words A great deal of the information on Rasputin is simply repeated verbatim from LAST EMPRESS. I would refer readers to the latter book. It is immensely superior to this book in every particular.