Man of War was, for me, a return to the bad old days of Rumours of War: choppy storylines and writing unable to rise above structual flaws in the novel. That's not to say its badly written - its not - but just that it cannot carry Mallinson's aspirations, which appear to be to write the perfect Patrick O'Brien/Jane Austen pastiche, only without all the zombies. Seriously, its duty this, duty that, visit the fiance, screw the mistress, travel somewhere, travel somewhere else, dinner at the Club...it goes on. And on.
Why so harsh? Well, see the cover - Hervey (I assume) on horseback, sabre in hand, charging...somewhere, at something. [Spoiler alert!] The reason you can't see any more than that, is that during the book the closest Hervey gets to an action scene (including the mistress visit mentioned above) is during some war games, and it's a bunch of redcoats Hervey is running at to capture the Dorney bridge. [End spoiler] This sequence is actually relevant to the wider story arc of Hervey's military progression, but when the climax of his story is a wedding...its not military historical fiction anymore.
To make up for this lack of action, Captain Peto takes up the heavy lifting, captaining the fictional 120-gun First Rate Prince Rupert, strangely a heavier gunned ship than I thought the British ships of the day were. Peto's story is to rejoice in his engagement to Elizabeth Hervey while carrying an Admiral's 13 year old daughter to Malta, prior to proceeding on to confront the Turks. Thus there is a bit of nautical action here, which is competantly done, and then a climactic battle at the end. Its almost like Peto is the hero of this book, not Hervey. Actually, he's a better man than Hervey too it appears, and I am starting to wish Mallinson had spent the last 9 books covering off the Peto adventures into which Hervey occasionally appears, not vice versa.
For all my complaints, its not a stinker of a book, its just missing that little bit that marks something out as top shelf. Its not a crime to fail to be as good as O'Brien. I'll keep going with Hervey - I have to, I bought all 10 books at once - but the ratio of words to deeds is starting to worry me. In addition, throwing in a reference to "Lord Bulwer-Lytton" may be historically accurate and plausible, but tends to make an unsatisfied reader think dark thoughts, as does titling a chapter "The Reverse of the Medal" after one of the Aubrey - Maturin series. Its not a good idea to first remind readers of a better book, and then of a bad writing award. Both little nods to the reader were better left out after the first draft, I think.
Here's to hoping Warrior, book 10, has a little less conversation, and a little more action.