This was in some ways a strange volume that compares oddly with other volumes of the New Oxford History of England. The series has suffered from being unsure as to whether it is designed to replace or supplement the earlier Oxford History of England. This volume is excellent on traditional political history, especially in the most limited sense of the term, which is of the formation and fall of governments. Indeed, at times it reads like a history of England written from the point of view of the Palace of Westminster. The book gives a full account of the political history of the period; of the formation of governments and of the legislation and of the intellectual thought of the period. However, it seems strangely lacking in wider analysis. The account of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is, in a book of over 600 pages covering only 63 years, for over a third of which Britain was involved in a desperate struggle for its very existence, rather slight. No one would expect a detailed survey of military history of the period; this is not the function of such a work, but a wider account of the Wars and of their impact on the nation seems called for. Equally, the volume has a heavy emphasis on the intellectual history of the period, which is both excessive and wholly out of balance with that in the rest of the Series (though it would seem very much part of the background and publishing history of the author; it may therefore be the late General Editor who ought to be criticised here). There is, I think, in a period that takes in the Industrial Revolution and the latter part of the Agricultural Revolution, more economic theory and philosophy than there is of economic history. The volume also suffers from a desire on the part of the author to draw more less (in my view less) apposite parallels between the history of the period and the politics of modern Britain. Particularly in contrast with Hoppen's magnificent volume in this series, which immediately follows this this one chronologically, this is disappointing, as it is in contrast with both Prestwich's and Harris's recently published volumes on the mediaeval period. I would strongly recommend this volume to anyone seeking an account of the political history of the period. As a wider vision of English society in this period I would not recommend it. It is I think, though a sound and highly readable work, inferior to most of the other volumes in this series.