| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
Dryden's version of the Antony and Cleopatra story, told as a heroic tragedy. Antony and Octavius Caesar are struggling for control of what was to become the Roman Empire. In the course of this struggle however, Antony and Cleopatra, the Queen of Egypt, both of whom are lovers and political allies, find that their forces have been defeated at the battle of Actium and the tragedy then plays out from there... The play is set in Alexandria, under siege by Octavius Caesar.
About the Author
John Dryden (1631 - 1700) was an influential poet, playwright and literary critic in the Restoration period. His work includes includes plays such as Marriage a la Mode (1672) and All for love (1678), as well as many fine examples of poetry. He was made poet Laureate in 1667.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Dryden's reworking of Shakespeare's "Antony and Cleopatra" is a great read, especially if you didn't fully comprehend Shakespeare's work. Dryden's language is concise, and his portrayal of historical characters is excellent; especially considering that he had to follow Shakespeare's lead.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This is a Restoration play. There is a myth going around about the Restoration in England after the Cromwell era that pretends they were imitating the French model. First of all it is absurd because the plays, most of those who have survived, or the masques and semi-operas are very often inspired from Shakespeare or Marlowe, hence the Elizabethan period, and not at all the French models. This here play is typical since it is a rewriting of Shakespeare's play Anthony and Cleopatra. We can maybe see in the attempt to unify the tone and genre by getting rid of any witty comic scene of any kind an influence from the classical drama in France at that time and their famous unities of place, time and subject. This version of this drama is more intensely centered on the love and friendship Antony may have experienced in his position and less on Cleopatra per se and her own world. Cleopatra is clearly set in contrast if not opposition with Octavia, Antony's wife, but that does not really bring any more light of any type to Cleopatra. She appears as being a calculating lover who is ready to do anything to retain her Antony. Antony on the other side is shown as a rather weak man who is divided between doing what is right for Rome and being faithful to his love and at the same time to his friends. He is thus manipulated to the utmost by Cleopatra who plays the jealous competition game and by Dolabella who takes advantage of this jealous game to get Cleopatra for himself. Then the play appears to be nothing but a long prologue to the final still life scene with Antony and Cleopatra in their regalia and political paraphernalia sitting dead on their thrones with the dead servants who have accompanied them in that fate at their feet and only Cleopatra's eunuch still alive and who will go to Rome for the Triumph of the Emperor and probably be put to death in some kind of entertaining way afterwards. What's left then after the play? Not much. Even the language of love and friendship is not that lyrical and poetical. It is rather flat. What's more it does not have the beauty of Shakespeare's verse because it is highly irregular. That period will only flourish with music and the semi-operas of Purcell and then the operas of Handel will find some beauty and style, with long and maybe boring plays behind by Dryden or others, but we have completely forgotten those plays and we only know the music of King Arthur or The Fairy Queen. The Restoration was the time when theaters were reopened after forty years or so of closure or limitations but it was not always all that funny and did not produce great plays that have survived their period. Freedom is not always the most inspiring force.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Paris 8 Saint Denis, University Paris 12 Créteil, CEGID
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Paris 8 Saint Denis, University Paris 12 Créteil, CEGID
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
2 reviews
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful
All For Love is a great retwelling of a classic story.
2 Dec 1998
Format:Paperback
Dryden's reworking of Shakespeare's "Antony and Cleopatra" is a great read, especially if you didn't fully comprehend Shakespeare's work. Dryden's language is concise, and his portrayal of historical characters is excellent; especially considering that he had to follow Shakespeare's lead.
Far from the Shakespearean model
11 Aug 2010
Format:Paperback
This is a Restoration play. There is a myth going around about the Restoration in England after the Cromwell era that pretends they were imitating the French model. First of all it is absurd because the plays, most of those who have survived, or the masques and semi-operas are very often inspired from Shakespeare or Marlowe, hence the Elizabethan period, and not at all the French models. This here play is typical since it is a rewriting of Shakespeare's play Anthony and Cleopatra. We can maybe see in the attempt to unify the tone and genre by getting rid of any witty comic scene of any kind an influence from the classical drama in France at that time and their famous unities of place, time and subject. This version of this drama is more intensely centered on the love and friendship Antony may have experienced in his position and less on Cleopatra per se and her own world. Cleopatra is clearly set in contrast if not opposition with Octavia, Antony's wife, but that does not really bring any more light of any type to Cleopatra. She appears as being a calculating lover who is ready to do anything to retain her Antony. Antony on the other side is shown as a rather weak man who is divided between doing what is right for Rome and being faithful to his love and at the same time to his friends. He is thus manipulated to the utmost by Cleopatra who plays the jealous competition game and by Dolabella who takes advantage of this jealous game to get Cleopatra for himself. Then the play appears to be nothing but a long prologue to the final still life scene with Antony and Cleopatra in their regalia and political paraphernalia sitting dead on their thrones with the dead servants who have accompanied them in that fate at their feet and only Cleopatra's eunuch still alive and who will go to Rome for the Triumph of the Emperor and probably be put to death in some kind of entertaining way afterwards. What's left then after the play? Not much. Even the language of love and friendship is not that lyrical and poetical. It is rather flat. What's more it does not have the beauty of Shakespeare's verse because it is highly irregular. That period will only flourish with music and the semi-operas of Purcell and then the operas of Handel will find some beauty and style, with long and maybe boring plays behind by Dryden or others, but we have completely forgotten those plays and we only know the music of King Arthur or The Fairy Queen. The Restoration was the time when theaters were reopened after forty years or so of closure or limitations but it was not always all that funny and did not produce great plays that have survived their period. Freedom is not always the most inspiring force.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Paris 8 Saint Denis, University Paris 12 Créteil, CEGID
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Paris 8 Saint Denis, University Paris 12 Créteil, CEGID
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
