Buy Used
£6.05
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Used Good condition book may have signs of cover wear and/or marks on corners and page edges. Inside pages may have highlighting, writing and underlining. All purchases eligible for Amazon customer service and a 30-day return policy.
Trade in your item
Get a £0.73
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Radius Books) Paperback – Apr 1974


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£24.15
Paperback
"Please retry"
£103.39 £3.25


Trade In this Item for up to £0.73
Trade in The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Radius Books) for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £0.73, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 480 pages
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd; Revised edition edition (April 1974)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0091117216
  • ISBN-13: 978-0091117214
  • Product Dimensions: 23.2 x 15.6 x 3.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 766,672 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
1
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This is a definitive piece of work for anyone who wants to understand scientific theory. However, it is not an easy read, even for those with a science background. If you are prepared to concentrate, the rewards are enormous.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback