'Live...' is one of those books I go back to and read again every couple of years. 5 stars may seem like a lot, especially as much weightier books have got less from me, but I love this book. The premise is simple yet very clever. Travellers from the late twentieth century attempt to go back in time to film the crucifixion, whilst in the future an unknown hacker is erasing the gospels. The visitors from the future try to persuade St. Paul's right hand man, St. Timothy, to anchor the TV show 'Live From Golgotha' and also to write a new gospel and hide it where it would be dug up in the future and save Christianity. As the book progresses St. Timothy becomes more confused as to which future traveller he can trust, which version of the gospel is true (the ones being erased, the ones told to him by St.Paul, or none of them) and even who was actually crucified.
Those not familiar with Vidal should be warned that the book is very surreal, and not supposed to make sense in a literal way. Vidal skips over all the usual complaints about time travelling conundrums by ignoring them. If you are the sort of person who worries when a book stretches credibility too far, then don't read this one. The surreal feel and humour are ever present, and the characters almost wink at you out of the pages, imploring you not to take any of it too seriously. There is also an element of contraversialism. St. Paul is a flamboyant gay tap dancing clown, St.Peter is thick, St. Timothy is a randy young adonis and Jesus has a hormone imbalance. Again, the easily offended should look elsewhere, but I don't think that this irreverant approach is simply to shock. There is a serious,and well made, point to this book. It is a satire on the way religions evolve over time, and the way the bible story could have been changed to suit different interests. The future visitors, Paul, Peter, the hacker, all strive to alter Timothy's gospel to tell the story the way they want it told, and to give the version of christianity that suits them. I think that the idea of lack of objective truth when re-telling history is planted firmly into the (albeit bizarre) story. I love this book for its irreverance, its silliness, its humour and its point, and don't think that it should be dismissed lightly because of its tone. It is very cleverly written, and is a fun and cerebral read.