...and that ain't necessarily a good thing. The truth of the matter is that this performance is clean, technically sound, completely accurate to the score, and perfectly in line with what is demanded of a modern "complete" recording. However, it has nothing of the Gypsy that inspired the music, displays no freedom or thinking outside the printed page, and is lacking in true personality. This is not Campanella's fault - he is playing what current trends demand, to a world of competitions and recordings all expecting accuracy before interpretation. And I can't fault those listeners who are impressed by this performance, as they are products of the same environment. Indication of this is to be found in the famous 2nd, which calls for a cadenza that is rarely supplied these days. But these performances are not at all in the true Liszt tradition, and I'm positive the Master would have found them banal, since it took much more than fancy fingerwork to impress the greatest pianist ever. He was also the greatest PLAYER ever, interpreting and communicating the soul of the music before the brilliance. Even with his downright show-off pieces, Liszt was renown as a great communicator on the piano.
If you want to own a compilation disc of these pieces and desire to hear truly great playing, check out the recording put out by VAI Audio which has a different performer from the past century playing each Rhapsody. Or check out Cziffra, Howard, or even Brendel. Magnificent performances of individual Rhapsodies can be found by Cortot, Brailowsky, Horowitz, Argerich, Rachmaninoff, and Marc-Andre Hamelin (the most recent). Some of the recordings are not technologically modern, but the playing makes up for it.