There have been a lot of books recently about the subprime scandal and the investment banking crisis. Many of these books are frankly opportunistic, but some are both readable and well-informed - as, for example, Michael Lewis's The Big Short. What all these books have in common is a certain sameness of approach. Most of them are written by insiders or former insiders, and insofar as they deal with broader questions at all, they tend to take a similar line rooted in common assumptions. Ho's book is a welcome exception.
First, although it contains anecdotal material, it is not an anecdotal or journalistic account of the crisis but a legitimate academic study by an anthropologist of the culture of Wall Street banking. Second, Ho did her original field research in the late nineties, and insofar as the present crisis is referenced it comes as an unexpected bonus - a timely confirmation of the validity of conclusions reached earlier and independently.
Ho's methodology references some familiar names - the influence of Bourdieu is obvious - and she makes no secret of her broadly leftist sympathies. However, she is a cool, objective and on the human level sympathetic observer of the culture she has chosen to dissect, and I found her analysis persuasive. (The 'Publisher's Description' above is a broadly accurate precis of this.)
If there is a criticism to be made, it is that it is not clear who might form the intended audience. The people who most need to read the book - the investment bankers and their political cheerleaders - will not do so, because to them the external world - never mind the academic world - is simply an irrelevance. On the other hand, the book may also be too slow-paced and carefully argued to appeal to a casual reader. This would be a pity. Non-academic readers who have a very low tolerance for academic prose may struggle a little with some of the denser sections, but I would urge them to persist. This is a valuable book.