First off:
I'm playing the demo as I speak. I plan on buying the full game from this site. I know I should play the actual game before making a review, but still, it's just that the last 2 reviews bothered me.
Judging by the demo so far, it's pretty much just like King Arthur(The demo version I've played, another one I plan on getting from this site) and it's a another nice improvement over Crusaders: Thy Kingdom Come.(Good game but the pacing is too slow when it comes to battles.) The pacing is just as fast as King Arthur and the battles feel more satisfying than Crusaders TKC and just as satisfying in King Arthur and the graphics are still beautiful. The negative side as far as I can tell, you can't conquer any territories you want like in King Arthur. Instead, you're set on a straight path, so that's why I give it 4 stars.
Now about the voices.
I'm an American myself. I will admit, the voices are a bit out of place since this is taking place during the Crusades(At least the acting is good and they say words that are NOT out of place). But that doesn't mean the game is terrible or that us Americans have "no class" just because the game doesn't have fitting voices. How would you feel if there was a game that was taking place in WWII and the American soldiers had British voices for some odd reason and I said "The British have no class for not making the Americans soldiers sound American"? You would probably be offended as well.
All and all, judging by the demo, the game seems pretty good and I hope to buy it. As for the last 2 reviewers, unfitting voices is only a minor issue in games. Gameplay is what matters the most. Period.