- mostly. The tone is obviously tongue in cheek: This dog that is more human than humans, regarding and reading how the humans feel, think and behave. At the same time the dog is philosophising and downright bragging of his literary knowledge and acquaintances in language so arch as to be past silly. So Marilyn is upstaged by her clever dog and she is viewed obliquely, distantly by the reader whose sympathy is engaged but not the sentimentality that could so easily overpower this subject matter. For all the dog's posturings he really is quite wise in places and makes some interesting conjunctions. Something about him reminds me of Tolstoy. He is impartial, kindly even, whilst noting and describing the great fragility, emptiness and nastiness of some of the human protagonists.Marilyn is portrayed as thoughtful and sincere.
I get the impression that the author really enjoyed writing this book, finding in it the opportunity to gather a great heap of glittery ephemera, dog related and other. I wonder if he did it for fun rather than for publishing and then thought that with as good a reputation as his he could get away with it.I think he has got away with it despite some confusing and dense extraneous parts that would have been better left out and the slightly uncomfortable dog's eye view conceit that gets just a little tiresome.