Brahms's total output of solo songs does not approach Schubert's 606 and I have never known the exact figure, but here are 164 of them to be going on with, and I think that constitutes a very high percentage.
The baritone voice is the timbre I generally find best suited to Brahms, and on these six discs we hear a lyric baritone among lyric baritones. This is one of the greatest voices of the 20th century, and I expect indeed of any century. To this God-given endowment Fischer-Dieskau brings artistry and professionalism of the highest and strictest order. You will find total technical perfection applied to the first song here: you will find loving understanding lavished on the 164th; and you will find both in equal measure in each and every one. Lyricism is the first and foremost requirement. Most of the poems here are what we would term `lyrics', although there are a few ballads and of course there are the four awesome biblical settings op 121. However Brahms, unlike his great contemporary songwriter Wolf but like Bach, is an `absolute' musician through and through. Music, not literary considerations, has primacy even more than it has in the songs of Schubert. However the tradition that Brahms embodies is that of Schubert, influenced along the way mainly, I believe, by Mendelssohn.
The stylistic descent from Schubert shows mainly in the vocal line, as is not surprising from a composer whose melodic gift rivals Schubert's own. However the piano parts go far beyond Schubert. It is in these that I think I hear Mendelssohn's influence, because in both Mendelssohn and Brahms the piano-writing is that of a proficient pianist. It is still `accompaniment' and not equal partnership as in Wolf, but the piano is no longer content to stay beneath the voice but often ventures boldly up into the voice's territory. What this must imply is that the piano-playing is of crucial importance, and we have on these six discs three players of high distinction, plus one who rates a description well beyond that.
I prefer the style and touch of Sawallisch to that of Moore or Barenboim because he lets more air into the texture. They all do well, but for me he does best, and so I was pleased to note that on the fourth disc Sawallisch does not hand over to Barenboim until after the Four Serious Songs. He starts these magnificently, and Fischer-Dieskau is able to darken his voice in a natural and impressive way, delivering a magnificent low note on `Toten' in the second song. All the sadder, then, that the one thing that is flunked in 164 songs is the greatest moment in the greatest of all Brahms's songs, the phrase beginning `Nun aber bleibet...' in the fourth of these four. I would have liked more `sense of occasion' from Fischer-Dieskau, but above all what happened to the stupendous chord at `Liebe'? This should be the Lost Chord itself, but here it is disappointingly normal. However there is a compensation. In the 15-song Magalone cycle the player is no less than Richter, and Richter at his wonderful best. It is not so much a matter of the insight shown as one of sheer pianistic talent, and if you want to hear how Brahms's piano-writing can sound comely and graceful without loss of power and grandeur, and do so because the control and balance of the player's touch are pure perfection, this is where you can hear it.
In terms of quantity, these discs represent outstanding value. The sound is excellent throughout, although the effect is startlingly different between the first and second discs. The German text of the songs is given, but nothing more - no translation(s), no liner comment. We should just be thankful for what we are given, especially as the German is very accurately printed. Here and there the editors tag this or that line or stanza as `not set by Brahms', in case we had not noticed. They may perhaps thank me for noticing that op in 43/2 the second stanza is not set either, and in op 72/3 only the first and third stanzas are sung, so I must suppose that only they are set. In opp 48/7 and 57/3 I heard some minor divergences from my text, for whatever reason, and in op 94/5 I suspect that the first four lines (not sung) do not even belong there. Otherwise the only unresolved issue for me how the poem to op 14/4 manages to have acquired the title `Sonnet'.
In one word - `terrific'.