On Liberty and Other Essays and over 1.5 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more

Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
Price: £2.85

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Colour:
Image not available

 
Start reading On Liberty and Other Essays on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford World's Classics) [Paperback]

John Stuart Mill , John Gray
4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £2.05  
Paperback £7.99  
Paperback, 5 Mar 1998 --  
Unknown Binding --  
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. Learn more.
There is a newer edition of this item:
On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford World's Classics) On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford World's Classics) 4.4 out of 5 stars (8)
£5.24
In stock.

Book Description

5 Mar 1998 0192833847 978-0192833846 New edition
Collected here in a single volume for the first time, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, Considerations on Representative Government, and The Subjection of Women show Mill applying his liberal utilitarian philosophy to a range of issues that remain vital today - issues of the nature of ethics, the scope and limits of individual liberty, the merits of and costs of democratic government, and the place of women in society. In his Introduction John Gray describes these essays as applications of Mill's doctrine of the Art of Life, as set out in A System of Logic. Using the resources of recent revisionist scholarship, he shows Mill's work to be far richer and subtler than traditional interpretations allow.


Product details

  • Paperback: 640 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford Paperbacks; New edition edition (5 Mar 1998)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0192833847
  • ISBN-13: 978-0192833846
  • Product Dimensions: 19.3 x 12.7 x 3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 314,450 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"Usefully brings together his main political essays in inexpensive and accessible form."--J.D. Peters, University of Iowa.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
THE subject of this Essay is not the so-called Liberty of the Will, so unfortunately opposed to the misnamed doctrine of Philosophical Necessity; but Civil, or Social Liberty: the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
4.8 out of 5 stars
4.8 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Liberty for all 5 Jan 2006
By Kurt Messick HALL OF FAME TOP 500 REVIEWER
Format:Paperback
It is surprising to me how many people assume that 'On Liberty' was written before or during the American Revolution - Mill was certainly influenced by the spirit of American liberty, which was variously romanticised and adapted in Britain and Europe during the nineteenth century. Published in 1859, 'On Liberty' is one of the primary political texts of the nineteenth century; perhaps only the writings of Marx had a similar impact, and of the two, in today's world, Mill's philosophy seems (please note that I only said 'seems') the one that is triumphant.

One of the interesting ideas behind 'On Liberty' is that this may in fact be more the inspiration of Harriet Taylor (later Mrs. J.S. Mill) than of Mill himself; Taylor wrote an essay on Toleration, most likely in 1832, but it remained unpublished until after her death. F.A. Hayek (free-market economist and philosopher) noticed this connection. Whether this was the direct inspiration or not, the principles are similar, and the Mills were rather united in their views about liberty.

'On Liberty' is more of an extended essay than a book - it isn't very long. It relates as a political piece to his general Utilitarianism and political reform ideology. A laissez faire capitalist in political economy, his writing has been described as 'improved Adam Smith' and 'popularised Ricardo'. Perhaps it is in part the brevity of 'On Liberty' that gives it an enduring quality.

There are five primary sections to the text. The introduction sets the stage philosophically and historically. He equates the histories of classical civilisations (Greece and Rome) with his contemporary England, stating that the struggle between liberty and authority is ever present and a primary feature of society. He does not hold with unbridled or unfettered democracy, either (contrary to some popular readings of his text) - he warns that the tyranny of the majority can be just as dangerous and damaging toward a society as any individual or oligarchic despotism. Mill looks for a liberty that permits individualism; thus, while democracy is an important feature for Mill, there must be a system of checks and balances that ensures individual liberties over and against this kind of system. All of these elements receive further development in subsequent sections.

The second section of the text is 'Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion'. Freedom of speech and expression is an important aspect here. Mill presents a somewhat radical proposition that even should the government and the people be in complete agreement with regard to coercive action, it would still be an illegitimate power. This is an important consideration in today's world, as governments and people contemplate the curtailment of civil liberties in favour of increased security needs. The possibility of fallibility, according to Mill, makes the power illegitimate, and (again according to Mill) it doesn't matter if it affects many or only a few, people today or posterity. It is still wrong. Mill develops this argument largely by using the history of religious ideas and religious institutions, in addition to the political (since the two were so often inter-related).

The third section is perhaps the best known and most quoted, 'Of Individuality, as One of the Elements of Well-Being'. It is perhaps a natural consequence of Enlightenment thinking that individuality over communal and corporate identity would dominate. Our world today goes back and forth between individual and communal identities (nationality, regionality, employment, church affiliation, school affiliation, sports teams, etc.). Mill's ideas of individual are very modern, quite at home with the ideas of modern political and civil individuality, with all of the responsibilities.

Mill states, 'No one pretends that actions should be as free as opinions.' He recognises the increased limitations on individual liberty given that we do live in communal settings, but this does not hinder the idea of individuality and individual liberty, particularly as it pertains to thoughts and speech. Mill explores various ideas of personal identity and action (medieval, Calvinist, etc.) to come up with an idea of individuality that is rather modern; of course, this is political personhood that pre-dates the advent of psychology/psychoanalytic theory that will give rise to a lot more confusion for the role of identity and personhood in society.

The fourth primary section looks theoretically at the individual in community, 'Of the Limits to the Authority of Society Over the Individual'; the final section looks at specific applications. Mill discounts the idea of social contract while maintain that there is a mutual responsibility between individuals and community. Mill looks at the Temperance movements and laws as an example of bad laws (not only from the aspect of curtailment of liberty, but also for impractical aspects of enforcement); in similar examples, Mill looks at the role of society in regulating the life of the individual, calling on good government to always err on the side of the individual.

Mill puts it very directly -- Individuals are accountable only to themselves, unless their actions concern the interests of society at large. Few in the Western world would argue with this today; however, we still live in a world where 'thought police' are feared, and 'political correctness' is debated as appropriate or not with regard to individual liberties.

Mill wrote extensively beyond this text, in areas of philosophy (logic, religion, ethics). The particular text here includes other essays of interest: 'Utilitarianism', 'Considerations on Representative Government', and 'The Subjection of Women', and also has a useful bibliography and index. The essay on Utilitarianism is one of the more contentious works of Mill; the later two contain ideas well ahead of their time, and many parts can be seen at work in modern democracies.

This should probably be required reading in civics classes, if not in the pre-university years for students, then certainly in the early university years.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A reliable edition of a classic text 10 Mar 2001
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
This is probably not the best edition of On Liberty - I would recommend Stefan Collini's Cambridge University Press edition for scholarly apparatus and background information. Generally the text is accurate (the various errors from the early editions have been corrected by John Gray). A few new, if unimportant, misprints have crept in, however. The footnotes are next to useless, giving explanations such as a description of Rousseau as "a philosopher". For those who simply want the text, however, this edition is perfectly fine, and has the benefit of the two lesser-known essays Considerations on Representative Government and The Subjection of Women in addition to On Liberty and Utilitarianism.

On Liberty has been a hugely influential, and also misinterpreted, work. Contrary to expectation, Mill formulates a fairly authoritarian model of government designed to root out behaviour which causes harm or offence to others, but the novelty in his treatment is his defence of the liberty to do in private what you want (so long as you harm no one), however immoral your behaviour. It may be a cliche to say it, but these issues could not be more relevant today, in debates about drugs and pornography especially.

Rather than the drier philosophical style of some of his works, these popular essays are vigorously written, in a clear and energetic style. There could not be a greater political polemicist than Mill - and this should be seen in the light of his life, where he actually put into practice what he preached in these essays - equality, liberty, and toleration.

Now, of how many philosophers can that be said?

Was this review helpful to you?
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Live and Let Live 31 Mar 2002
By Ben Saunders VINE™ VOICE
Format:Paperback
The author of On Liberty, John Stuart Mill (known as J. S. Mill to avoid confusion with his father James), was a 19th century liberal, most famous for his Utilitarianism, espousing the view that the morally right action was that producing the most happiness. On Liberty, a political tract, was written at much the same time, and published in 1859.

Thankfully 19th century English isn't a very different language, so there's no need to worry about the translation or editing. But why read it at all? Well, Mill's thought may not have been entirely original, but it was elegantly put. His writing general aimed to make his ideas accessible to the common man, and On Liberty shares his typical ease of reading. What's more, the ideas he presents were (and still are) immensely influential.

The basis of Mill's theory could be summed up 'live and let live'. In his own words, "Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest" (p17, my edition). Such an idea has continued to affect political decisions, for example reference to it was made when homosexuality was legalised in this country. Mill's aim was to defend freedoms of thought, action and association. Even though this sometimes conflicted with a society unwilling to question, for example, the Bible or supposed inferiority of women, Mill's argument was that the truth is best demonstrated as such by defeating opposing views in rational debate, not by repressing them.

The extent to which Mill was ahead of his time can be over-emphasised. Admittedly he argued for the equality of women and universal suffrage, but it is worth noting he envisaged a scheme in which people should have differential voting power according to, for example, education. Despite this, he was still a far-sighted intellectual of his time, and someone who helped lay the foundations of modern social and political thought.

Mill's idealism was not untempered, however. The picture he paints is not of some vain utopia; rather he recognises "All that makes existence valuable to anyone, depends on the enforcement of restraints upon the actions of other people. Some rules of conduct, therefore, must be imposed" (p9). With this in mind, he formulates the central 'harm principle'.

The only basis, he argued, for restricting anyone's liberty (assuming them to be competent adults) was to prevent harm to others. Mill was prepared to allow what may be seen as 'self harm' both because he thought individual autonomy important, and because he argued no other agent could determine what was in someone else's interests. The problem with the harm principle, however, is its vagueness, and much criticism focused on what was included in the notion of 'harm to others'.

It seems 'harm' refers to an individual's fundamental interests. In the normal course of affairs, for example, Mill would have allowed me the right to commit suicide, for though it might upset my family and friends, I do not have an overriding obligation to them to stay alive. When this becomes a matter of their interests, for example if I am the father of young children, and effectively contractually bound to provide for them, then I am not at liberty to kill myself, and society would be justified in stopping me.

As I've presented it here, it seems a very simple idea. On the surface, it is; but obviously you can appreciate controversy about what exactly counts as 'other-harm' continues, and there is a wealth of literature on the subject. If you're studying On Liberty then texts I recommend (which I used at first year degree level) include:

John Gray, Mill on Liberty: A Defence
and the collection of essays in:
Alan Ryan, Mill

Also of interest may be Chapter 8 of Roger Crisp's Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism; which deals with the claim utilitarianism conflicts with liberty, since the 'harm principle' may not guarantee the greatest happiness and hence paternalism could be justified.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Feedback