One feature of the book has been to highlight personal responsibility eg. of Richard Dawkins as perceived by Roger Steer in points 1-6 (p.4,5). It is interesting that scientists least inclined to consider the importance of personhood are often most acutely aware of the personal responsibility of someone like Roger holding views, no matter how charitable, of Richard's.As Roger says, listen to any chat show receiving views from the public and it is clear how much people view others as right or wrong or, indeed, as personally responsible.
It was, therefore, wholly appropriate that Roger Steer wrote an open letter from a person to a person.In the desire to represent and explain reality in terms only of automata, the intrusion of personhood is often unwanted. It is suppressed, denied and assumed not really to exist in an automatic world. I am not qualified to comment on the precision, beauty, simplicity or otherwise of scientific explanations of this avowedly impersonal world, but what I do know is that an image-shattering Person communicated real love through something far deeper than words to any persons able to receive that message verbally and that the personal faithfulness of Jesus Christ has proved true for over 30 years, in my life. And if that's personal, well I told you so.