Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation [Hardcover]

David M. Rohl
4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details.


Product details

  • Hardcover: 448 pages
  • Publisher: Century; First Edition, First Impression edition (8 Oct 1998)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 071267747X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0712677479
  • Product Dimensions: 24.9 x 19.6 x 3.3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 219,164 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Amazon.co.uk Review

Egyptologist and archaeologist David Rohl sets out to discover the historical truth which lies at the very heart of the Book of Genesis, but what Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation ends up being is a new Rohl-legend about the beginning of ancient Near Eastern civilisation--with many gaps.

The book is divided into three parts. Firstly, Rohl proposes that Eden and its garden was between Lakes Van and Urmin and the Caspian Sea, with Nod on its east. Then he claims the ancestors of the Sumerians migrated in the 6th millennium BC from this "Eden" to Mesopotamia, establishing Sumerian culture there, and identical with biblical Shem. The Mesopotamian and biblical Flood, he sets in the late 4th millennium BC. In part three, Rohl brings Sumerian traders to East Africa (Punt & Sudan--"Kush"), and Egypt, becoming founders of Pharaonic Egypt, using cultural links c.3000BC.

Rohl needlessly burdens the book with the "new chronology" from his Test of Time of 1995, which is known to be 100 per cent wrong (along with the biblical "identifications") from a mass of contrary factual evidence. Rohl's story is also weakened by unsustainable guesswork on supposed language-links, artificial identifications of early biblical and Mesopotamian characters, etc. It's a lively "read", but much of it is likely to prove fictional, not historical. --Kenneth Kitchen

Product Description

A sequel to "A Test of Time", this text continues the author's pursuit for historical truth, and reveals what really happened in seven famous myths and legends, showing us that the passage of time has not wiped away all the evidence of the reality behind the legends.

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (3)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.3 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars In the Tradition of Heyerdahl, 27 Oct 1999
By 
Erik K. Divietro "Unorthodox Faith" (Manchester, NH) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation (Hardcover)
In Kon-Tiki, Thor Heyerdahl wrote that he found most anthropologists and archaeologists so focused on their specialties that they never saw the obvious ties between their fields. That was in the 1960's. Looking at the technological explosion we have experienced in the past 30 years, is it no suprise that another scholar must emerge and make the same statement? This man is David Rohl. His work is universal in scope, and even if some of his conclusions may appear controversial, he is one of the few modern scholars willing to look at the facts in a different light and reach a more satisfactory conclusion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars entertaining, 18 Mar 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation (Hardcover)
David Rohl is bravely attempting to rewrite our views of early human civilization. Unlike Graham Hancock who was a respected journalist before becoming a revisionist, Mr. Rohl was a music producer. Perhaps this is the reason for the vitreollic response of "official" egyptologists to his work. If one is prepared to sift through the evidence, and then realistically compare it to the "conventional wisdom" on the subject, the result is that Rohl's thesis is at least as convincing as the one put forward by traditionalists. Although this book is less well supported with hard evidence than his previous work, as a profesional scientist, I found his arguments based on his evidence very reasonable. This book is well worth reading. As far as I am aware, there is at least as much conflicting evidence presented by traditionalists such as Professor Kenneth Kitchen (whose area of expertise is the same period of time Rohl would have us re-evaluate in his previous book - hence the review you might also come across of this current work, and the American Mark Lerner. Perhaps it is wise for we "lay people" to be furnished with all the available interpretations of the data?

Dr. Shaun M. Heale

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars facinating; but arguments not as strong as in a Test of Time, 6 Jun 2001
This review is from: Legend: The Genesis of Civilisation (Hardcover)
A thought provoking and well researched book, however, I found the arguments less compelling than those contained within a Test of Time as I didn't feel that they had the same strength and there was less cross-correlation (not surprising as we are in effect dealing with pre-history). I felt that there was too much conjecture and the conclusions are subjective rather than proven (I was reminded of the Eric von Daniken 'could this be ... type of phrase.) The theory does, however, merit much more research and would be overpowering if proven.

I would very much like to see a TV series exploring it.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews





Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback