"Leadership" seems to be one of those concepts that pop up time and again in almost all spheres of life. In business, education, politics, and all sorts of other fields of human endeavor leadership is touted as one of the most important and valuable characteristics that any individual could be blessed with. There are whole sections of some bigger bookstores dedicated to "leadership" literature, and the number of books published on the subject seems to be increasing exponentially. I have been interested for a while to learn if there is something more profound behind the whole notion of leadership than what my common sense was telling me, and was hoping that this very short introduction would shed some light on it. Unfortunately, I don't think that I am anywhere more enlightened on this topic then before, and I am starting to feel the same way that many serious social scientists have felt for a while: leadership is more hype than substance, and it is one of the biggest unpaid promissory notes in all of social science.
This book has a decidedly non-academic feel to it. This in itself is not a problem, as some of the best books in this series have been written by the non-academic authors. However, this book has a very "self help" feel to it, with a lot of jargon and graphs that look like they have been taken straight out of PowerPoint presentations. There are very few hard facts in the whole book, and the level of analysis seems to be very superficial. There are numerous instances throughout the book where the author jumps to some ridiculous conclusions based on the scantiest of evidence or, even worse, without even making a perfunctory effort to actually construct a cogent argument. The worst of these offenses is a purported link between a particular leadership style and the 2008 economic crisis. I have never heard of this particular theory behind what happened in 2008, and it seems extremely implausible that something as ethereal as a form of leadership could be the root cause for such a devastating event, but I would be willing to listen to a cogent argument based on verifiable facts. However, the author doesn't even deign to connect the dots and portrays the conclusions as so evident that they don't even merit being clearly stated.
Some of the material in the book is interesting enough. I did learn a lot about different historical leaders and their achievements. This, however, could have been better handled by a proper book of history.
As mentioned before, some of the big questions that I have about leadership have not been properly addressed in this book. What is leadership? Is it a proper social science construct, and if so how can we best describe it and hopefully measure it? Is it innate or is it more determined by the environmental forces? If the former, can leadership be learned? Is leadership something that everyone should ideally have, or is it better to have just a few chosen individuals or groups exhibit it? I am still trying to find the answers to these and many more questions, and I hope to come across a book that provides at least some of them.