The title and blurb to the contrary, this book is not about A.A., or even A.A. in L.A., although its second half does make a few vivid observations of the latter. This book isn't quite sure what it's about, perhaps because its author combines the encyclopediac tendency of the graduate student with the rambling narrative of the drinker.
So he begins by listing famous writer drunks, and famous writing about drunks (an enjoyable sort of annotated bibliography), then veers into AA as a path to his own autobiography. Nothing so strange about this -- AA is, as Sutherland notes, a story-telling cure -- but it is striking that he requires two frames, one literary, one sociological, to tell his personal story.
Alcoholics feel excluded and "other," and crave connection, and this may explain Sutherland's need to provide a double context for his narrative. It might also shed light on his excessive use of quotation, reference and allusion (often with a further, unnecessary "as they say" tagged on). He welcomes even cliches, which provide, apparently, a sense of being "with it" or "in the know."
Belonging, then, is everything. The lousy AA coffee is referred to at least four times, and there is no thought of over-repetition; what is important is to share in the dicton. Quotes are oddly transformed (e.g. Chaucer's rains become "soote shoures"). Outright contradictions are made: AA both is and is not an effective treatment for alcoholics. Exactness does not seem to be the point; it is rather the drive to show familiarity with all has been said on the subject (and a good many others).
If you have the patience for this kind of discourse, you are probably, like the author himself, a connoisseur of AA stories, and will enjoy this curious tripartite little book.