Michael Burr is the kind of author I like to read. He's taken a familiar story, the rise of Harald Hardraada and his part in the momentous year 1066, but he's asked questions (for example, why a man like Harold Godwinson's brother Tostig would appear to betray England and side with a vicious Viking like Hardraada). The answers lie at the end, but the innovative storyline leading up to 1066, ending just before Hastings, builds tension and pace and keeps you guessing, even though you know what happens to Hardraada and Tostig at Stamford Bridge.
`What's more fun than history?' asks Burr in his notes. `Only perhaps history's "what ifs"...' That's what I like. Otherwise you're just retelling what everyone believes happened anyway.
Burr generates this intrigue by creating The Scraeling, a victim of an early Hardraada raid who becomes the Viking's chief of staff while operating in Kiev, Constantinople and back in Norway. This central character is frequently described as `cunning' and, by Hardraada as `the most dangerous little bugger alive'. I would dispute Hardraada's observation, mainly because we grow to like and admire The Scraeling and he gets the girl(s) who fall for the softer side of his nature. Cunning, yes, because he has a plan, also determined -- it's a life's work to achieve his momentous goal, and as the story develops you fear for him.
This is a story of a ruthless man so it's full of savagery, cruelty, rape and pillage, and on top of that there are several explicit sex scenes. These are (mostly) probably true to the times. The English are, of course, generally portrayed as noble and honourable, thus giving the necessary contrasts. A fascinating read, made the more so by Burr's innovative and well thought out "what ifs".