Bruce Fink, with his books The Lacanian Subject and Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis, has established his reputation as the premiere commentator of Lacan. Fink is the quitessential "subject supposed to know," if there ever was one (other than the unconscious that is). This book only furthers this reputation, bringing together six beautifully written essays. Fink is a practising and a training analyst and this background gives his commentary a force of clarity and groundedness that is missing in much of the literature on Lacan. It is because he grounds his readings of Lacan in practical situations that lends his books to first timers AND long time readers. His command of Lacan's text is second to none, and therefore a first timer can put (or, transfer) their trust that Fink is guiding them through to the truth of Lacan.
It is this same brilliant reputation that also makes Fink's writing often seem secondary. As if they were mere explanations of Lacan's difficult texts. Like the biblical John the Baptist who was only the herald of the coming messiah, whose sandal lace he was unwrothy to tie, Fink always seems to position himself as the lone voice crying in the Freudian field, calling all who will hear to repent and return to the letter of Lacan's text. This is certainly true of Fink's earlier works. But this book has a different force behind it. Don't get me wrong: these are rigorous commentaries on Lacan's texts. But somehow, through some kind of magic, Fink is able to push commentary to the limit such that it emerges as an original voice itself. In other words, Fink here speaks as Fink. The herald cannot tie even his own lace as it were! This is why I especially recommend this book to long time readers of Lacan and of Fink. In this book, you get something that approximates a Finkian psychoanalysis. The highlight is Chapter 3 on The Letter--a brilliant piece of writing that sounds all by itself.
In the era where deconstructing the ambiguous meaning of a text seems the hegemony, it is quite refreshing to see someone practising COMMENTARY. That is, the practice of unpacking what is actually in the letter. Commentary, it seems to me, is much more interesting than interpretation or, what is now referred to as, "reading."
Lacan once said that commenting on a text is like analysis. Then, it is no wonder that Fink, an accomplished analyst, can present a beautiful piece of commentary such as this!