. . .novel about the life of King David.
In "King of Kings", the late Dr. Malachi Martin presents a novel based upon the life of King David -- a central figure in both Judaism and Christianity. Dr. Martin was a scholar in Semitic languages and this background shows through in this book.
However, this novel is average at best. Martin takes certain available archeological evidence -- and then from that evidence, constructs an anthropology which may -- or may not -- be accurate, or even reasonable. This is a novel; this is his perogative. However, others may disagree with his interpretation.
The book also suffers in that the enormous majority of the text deals with the early days of David's life. His kingship (which lasted roughly 40 years) is treated only in the final third of the book -- and the seminal events of his kingship are given even less attention. (Bathsheva shows up only after the book is 3/4 finished; the revolt by Absalom is given only a few pages at the end; etc.)
There is also a "re-telling" of elements of the story which go beyond a novelist's "artistic license". I'll provide some examples:
Item: It is strongly suggested that David connived at the murder of Abner by Joab. According to the text itself, Joab killed Abner in cold blood as revenge for Abner's killing of Joab's brother in battle. (Joab's brother, who was a fairly significant character in the beginning of the book just drops out of sight.)
Item: It is strongly suggested that Joab killed Absalom in a blind rage having to do with Absalom's revolt. According to the text, Joab bore Absalom a personal grudge -- and had for years. This dynamic (which makes the killing make more sense) was missing from the book.
Item: It is again strongly suggested that Joab's murder of Amasa was also with the connivance of David. According to the text, Joab had no such order -- and David bore Joab a lasting grudge for the murders of both Abner AND Amasa.
Other readers may notice other examples -- these were just a few which occurred to me.
An enjoyable read -- but not, in my opinion, a really good novel about the subject.