I did not find this book to be 'even-handed' at all - in fact, I have to be honest and admit that I gave up before I had finished it, due to a severe attack of exasperation. So why two stars and not one?
Well, it raises interesting issues and questions that need to be confronted: if Native American groups are to be 'sovereign' they are going to have to tackle human rights issues. I did, though, find it a trifle jarring to have a white American lecturing American Indians on human rights, and urging them into a more 'intimate' relationship with the good ol' US of A. Knowing what I know of the dealings between the two sides over the last few centuries, I can quite see why some Indians don't want anything to do with the governments of the US and Canada at all. They have to, though: they're stuck. That doesn't mean that they have to assimilate, which is what Bordewich seems to be suggesting that they'll do - maybe even should do. A happy Indian, he seems to be saying, is one who melds in with wider American society, and he never misses a chance to point out the high rates of intermarriage between Native Americans and other groups, and the diminishing proportion of Indians who are full bloods, as if this in some way negates any rights they have to just treatment at the hands of the US government.
I was particularly irritated by some easily identitifed niggles, and I'll only bore you with two. Firstly, in the introduction, he refuses to use the term 'Native American' because he feels it to be inaccurate and 'strained'. Now, it's not a term which every American Indian is happy with (the author Sherman Alexie, for example, reckons it's the product of white liberal guilt) but others don't like 'Indian' because it's plain wrong. Secondly, he dismisses, in about two lines, a stack of academic research into the connections between the confederation of the Six Nations (Iroquois or Haudenosaunee, the group which includes the Mohawks) and Benjamin Franklin's ideas, when it is pretty clear from what Franklin wrote that he was impressed by the political system the Six Nations had in place and didn't see why, if a bunch of 'savages' could manage it, some English colonies couldn't. He doesn't seem to think the Six Nations had anything to offer.
Thirdly... No, I said only two, and I'll stick to that. Two stars, because he's done a lot of legwork, and raises some questions that need to be considered, and has told some of the more shaming stories of the treatment of the Native Americans. And it's very readable, until your blood pressure starts to climb.
Even-handed it is not.