Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
£19.48
  • RRP: £19.80
  • You Save: £0.32 (2%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 4 left in stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Keynes Hayek: The Clash T... has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics MP3 CD – Audiobook, 31 Oct 2011


See all 7 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
MP3 CD, Audiobook
"Please retry"
£19.48
£12.18 £16.95
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
£19.48 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 4 left in stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.


Product details

  • MP3 CD
  • Publisher: Tantor Media Inc; MP3 Una edition (31 Oct. 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 145265493X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1452654935
  • Product Dimensions: 13.5 x 1.5 x 18.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,511,840 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"In Keynes Hayek Nicholas Wapshott sets himself the formidable task of explaining important and abstruse ideas clearly, reliably and entertainingly. He succeeds well." The Times "It [Keynes Hayek] harnesses the author's skills as a journalist in a lucid and accessible introduction to Hayek's work...Again, the author has done his homework in getting on top of the vast literature about Keynes..." The Guardian "...path-breaking account of the long intellectual duel between Friedrich Hayek and Keynes..." New Statesman "Nicholas Wapshott's Keynes Hayek is an ambitious, well-written and enjoyable attempt to grapple with fundamental debates about economic and social organization. It is an entertaining account of the work of two powerful thinkers who made lasting contributions to those debates." Tim Congdon, Times Literary Supplement "He [Wapshott] is an acomplished writer who drives his narrative at a pace and draws judiciously on a crowded shelf of studies of his protagonists and their work...fascinating reading..." The Literary Review "His [Nicholas Wapshott's] account of the origins and early application of the competing theories is readable, intelligent, and even-handed." Reuters "I heartily recommend Nicholas Wapshott's new book, Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics... Many books have been written about Keynes, but nobody else has told the story properly of his relationship with Hayek. Nick has filled the gap in splendid fashion, and I defy anybody - Keynesian, Hayekian, or uncommitted - to read his work and not learn something new." John Cassidy, The New Yorker "Wapshott does a good job of explaining the duo's sometimes complex theories...Overall, it's well worth a read." Money Week "...an enjoyable and clear read..." --The Business Economist --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

About the Author

A former senior editor at The Times and The New York Sun, Nicholas Wapshott is a journalist and the author of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: A Political Marriage. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Stephen Moffatt on 12 Mar. 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This book has lots to recommend itself to the general reader with an interest in modern history, politics and economics. The author does a wonderful job of explaining how the Keynes and Hayeks views on how an economy works/should work differed and gives a brief summary of their earlier lives that suggests how, to some extent these views were conditioned by their experience of things like war and economic depression earlier in their lives. I found it really informative of how (in Europe and the USA anyway) the political left and right have been divided, post-WWII along Keynesian and Hayekian economic lines.
There's also a lovely treatment of their clashes in economic and academic publications - it's really well written so that you get a sense of the passion and emotion behind their letters and publications even though they're couched in very academic and measured terms. Can't recommend this book highly enough.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By M Smyth on 26 Jan. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
An excellent account of the differences between Keynes and Hayek. A blow by blow account of their interactions and a most readable delivery of their economic policies. A good read for anyone interested in economic theory. Very informative.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
42 of 51 people found the following review helpful By Mr. M. Russell on 22 Dec. 2011
Format: Kindle Edition
The book tries to suggest that the whole of economic agrument on policy falls into two camps. Austrian and Keynesian. This is simplistic and misleading. However the idea of seeing the debate on policy from the two camps is interesting and entertaining.

The book lacks depth of explanation of either Keynes or Austrian theory. This means that anyone who does not already know them (and by this I mean what Keynes wrote, not what Keynesians wrote after his death) will find the significance of many of the comments reported from the debate difficult to understand properly.

The author also fails to consider the complexity of the various schools of economics. While he explains that Keynes successfully introduced the idea of looking at the economy from 'the top down' - macroeconomics - he does not clearly explain the reliance of Keynes on the demand side alone. Consequently he misses an important aspect of the criticism of Keynes in terms of markets and understates the important move to reconsider the supply side as a policy issue. Instead the author seems to think it is part of the monetarist counter-revolution, which it is not.

But perhaps the most disappointing aspect of the book is the sloppy mistakes. The author attributes views to people they never had in broad generalizations and makes mistakes on dates and people. For example, getting the date of Margaret Thatcher becoming Prime Minister wrong, which was not the same day as Hayek's birthday as he claims (a month and four days out respectively), and making Ben Bernanke Chairman of the Fed on Friedman's 90th birthday, over three years before he actually got the job! Such mistakes makes one wonder how many other inaccuracies got past the proof readers and has devalued the entire work.
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Geoff Crocker on 2 Oct. 2012
Format: Paperback
This is a very readable narrative which compensates for minor error in detail. It's a good primer for those not familiar with the story, and a refresher for those who are.

There is some mixing of issues which need separate treatment, ie i) macroeconomic demand management which is an economics issue, ii) the role of the state which is political, and iii) whether demand management should be by fiscal or monetary instruments, a technical economic issue.

On the first of these, Keynes emerges as undoubtedly correct, and Nicholas Wapshott is wrong to say (p286) that `the application of all three of Keynes' remedies simultaneously for three decades resulted in stagflation'. It was the exogenous shock of the OPEC oil price rise which led to the unexpected result of stagflation, ie Keynesian policy was disrupted by such a major commodity price shock which did not fit into any `ceteris paribus' assumption. On the second point, Hayek was also wrong. Good decisions can be made by good communities, and the concept that only individuals and not communities of individuals can make decisions is clearly nonsensical. On the third, the supply of money became an unmeasurable and uncontrollable monetary instrument, leading to attempted monetarist control by its price, ie the interest rate. But this proves far too blunt an instrument. Where extensive mortgages are held by consumers as in the UK economy, it effectively acts as an instant tax instrument, whilst also affecting the cost of production and hence competitiveness and inflation, the exchange rate and hence the balance of trade etc.

Supply side economics in fact focuses on the money supply, and fails to consider the real supply side of the economy.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful By Europa on 30 Jan. 2012
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Keynes and Hayek got to know each other well, and had many of the most
basic ideas about economics in common. How they argued and failed to
resolve their differences is a tale well told by this skilled storyteller.

I couldn't put it down, not many books about economics have that effect, except perhaps on economists! The book also bridges the gap between academic economic thought, and it's application by politicians in desperate times.

There is a vast cast of characters involved in both men's lives, most
especially in Keynes, who was part of fashionable literary and artistic cliques, whose investments he looked after, which allowed them to be free from the constraints of earning a living.

I felt in the end enormous respect for both Keynes and Hayek as men, and for their professional commitment and courage, both in their working and in their personal lives.

Don't look at the ending, it will have much more punch if you wait till you get there.

Is the conclusion justified? Well, that's your call.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback