I found this book while researching Tituba's role in the Salem witch trials and her subsequent representations in retellings and legends surrounding these events. While it does include information that can be backed up with other sources, there were no new theories or ideas presented. Even the last theory, that Tituba really was a witch, is a conjecture found elsewhere, especially in the minds of children reading "The Crucible" in class. My main issue with this book, however, is that it drifts off topic. In the middle of talking about Tituba being beaten by her master, it drifts off into talking about John Proctor's allegations of torture by the authorities, then suddenly to the accusations of torture--specifically water-boarding--in the modern United States. This had nothing to do with the book, and the author even admitted to straying off track, but he continued to talk about how "everyone knows that the US doesn't use torture because torture is illegal" and how water-boarding, therefore, is not torture. There is an attempt to tie this back in by saying that the dunking test used against witches (although not at Salem) is an early version of water-boarding, and therefore not torture. If I wanted to read political ideologies and opinions on investigative tactics, I would search out sources for those. A sentence to help the modern reader identify with history is one thing, entire pages on this were useless to the current argument (that Tituba was a witch). I came to this book for historical analysis, nothing more.