Buy Used
Used - Good See details
Price: 2.92

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Joan of Arc: The Image of Female Heroism [Paperback]

Marina Warner
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

21 Nov 1991
Set against the time in which she lived and against the successive historical and cultural climates that have used her image for their own ends, Joan of Arc is depicted here as a "heroine for all seasons". The author's other books include "Alone of All Her Sex" and "Monuments and Maidens".

Product details

  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Vintage; New edition edition (21 Nov 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0099884208
  • ISBN-13: 978-0099884200
  • Product Dimensions: 19.8 x 12.4 x 3 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 348,621 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


"Elegantly written, thoughtful (as one would expect from the author of "Alone of All Her Sex), imaginative, sensitive. Warner ranges through iconographic, allegorical, literary, dramatic, operatic, cinematographic, linguistic, historical, biographical, and political evidence to present a history of Joan and of her subsequent representations."--"Choice --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Marina Warner is a historian and novelist; among her books are No Go the Bogeyman: Scaring, Lulling, and Making Mock (1998), From the Beast to the Blonde: On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers (1995), and Alone of All Her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary (1983). She lives in London. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3 star
2 star
1 star
4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A Heroine for All Seasons 31 Aug 2007
By Nicholas Casley TOP 500 REVIEWER
This book deserves the praise that was piled upon it when it was first published in 1981. This is not a formal biography of Joan of Arc, and yet its content contains all the salient issues arising in her short life and more. That "and more" is Marina Warner's critique of Joan's life and her reception by both contemporaries and history. The subtitle of the book - "The Image of Female Heroism" - might make it appear as a largely feminist critique. Not so! It is more rounded and comprehensive than such a narrow description portrays.

The book is split into two parts, and its contents might be well-grasped by the titles of the chapters contained therein. The first part details Joan's reception in her own life and times, with chapters on Joan as the virgin Maid of France; Joan as Prophet; Joan as Harlot of the Armagnacs; Joan as Heretic; Joan as the Ideal Androgyne; and Joan as Knight. In addition there are chapters on the Divided Realm of France as well as the King and his Crown.

The second part treats Joan's reputation after her death all the way up to the twentieth century. So we have chapters on her Vindication; Joan as Amazon; Joan as the Personification of Virtue; Joan perceived as Child of Nature; Joan as Saint or Patriot?

The book is wide-ranging, crossing many disciplines and many timelines. It is recommended that the reader have at least some knowledge of her life in order to fully appreciate the multiple strands of thought offered by Marina Warner on this 'heroine for all seasons'.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The ultimate study of Joan of Arc 11 Jan 2011
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
This book has long been acknowledged as a classic of scolarly investigations into the life, history and myth of Joan of Arc. Marina Warner is a cultural historian and the strength of this book is in her realism, depth and understandinga corss multiple disciplines. We do not just get a potted chart of Joan's achievements - these are placed in their rightful context: medieval history, French society, the mythology of women, classical imagery, religious inspiration and so on. It is typical of Warner's erudition and brilliant writing style that, despite the wealth of learning and research on display, this book could be read, understood and enjoyed by anyone interested in this or any of the aforementioned related subjects. An absolute triumph... now goa nd read Warner on fairytales (From The Beast To The Blonde), monuments (Monuments and Maidens) and a host of the other diverse topics she is interested in and an expert on!
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Woman inside the Armour 4 Oct 2003
Marina Warner writes a fine narrative, a solid biography with depth and emotion which also explores the female and the feminist aspects of Joan. Joan is a 15th century heroine and national icon, but she is also a woman subject to complex exploitation and manipulation by male society. It is an engaging and enthralling work.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 2.7 out of 5 stars  12 reviews
51 of 58 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Only A Vague Resemblance to Joan's History 31 Oct 2000
By A Customer - Published on
As a researcher who has done work on this subject, I tend to be baffled by the popularity of books such as this one. On the plus side, and to be fair, the author at least bothered to read some of the more reliable documents (such as the Rehabilitation transcript, Joan's surviving letters, etc) rather than merely the Condemnation transcript; but unfortunately the author didn't seem to pay much attention to the more reliable documents. Yet again, we have here a modern author who credulously accepts many of the accusations made by Joan's enemies while passing over the larger amount of evidence which soundly debunks those accusations, while mixing in a hefty dose of radical politics and speculation, plus page after page in which the text wanders through ancient legends and other such topics to the point that Joan herself is often obscured entirely. A good example of this is the "Ideal Androgyne" chapter, which ignores the extensive testimony from the Rehabilitation transcript: i.e., two of the men who escorted her to Chinon said that they were the ones who first brought up the subject of dressing her in soldiers' clothing (as was standard procedure when bringing a woman through dangerous territory), and several of the clergy who took part in her trial testified that she clung to this clothing and kept her pants and tunic "firmly laced and tied" (i.e., the pants were kept fastened to the tunic so they couldn't be forcibly pulled off) because she had been subjected to attempted rape at the hands of her guards and therefore was afraid of "being violated in the night", to quote one witness. To a scholar of the medieval period none of this comes as a surprise: it was common for women to adopt such clothing for their own defense, and medieval theologians - including St. Thomas Aquinas himself - had ruled that such conduct was permissible if it was being done out of necessity (the Church only condemned the practice if it was done for other reasons, a distinction which Joan's accusers deliberately ignored, as do many modern authors). Despite the author's claims to the contrary, this subject was in fact dealt with at the Rehabilitation, and in fact the Inquisitor devoted an entire section - Chapter 6 of his "Recollectio" - to that subject, and exonerated her of any wrongdoing on that front. He also ruled that her voices were not suspect (despite the author's claims to the contrary), and in fact declared her a martyr ("...for in very truth she always had good reason to trust in her apparitions, for they delivered her, just as they promised, from the prison of the body through martyrdom and a great victory of patience.") Warner's book replaces much of this evidence with speculation, endless political rhetoric, and modern philosophies which have nothing whatsoever to do with 15th century history.
On the point about Régine Pernoud: the charge that Pernoud was a hopeless fan of Charles VII who omitted to mention the letter about the siege of Paris is patently false: the entire text of that letter is included (both in the original language and in translation) in Pernoud's book "Joan of Arc: Her Story" [called simply "Jeanne d'Arc" in the French version], and many of her books contain scathing criticisms of Charles VII. Scholars consider Pernoud to have been one of the best authors on this subject because she was accurate, thorough, and honest in her presentation of the evidence, which is not something that can be said about the book currently under review. And there lies the crux of the issue: historical writing is supposed to be based upon documented evidence, properly analyzed in light of the circumstances of the time period, rather than a mishmash of modern-day politics superimposed upon historical figures and events. This book falls into the latter category, unfortunately.
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Begging to Differ 23 Nov 2005
By Jeanette Romee - Published on
One wonders by what process a review gets chosen for featured status. I must concur with the unfavorable reviews. Warner treats the condemnation trial transcript as a privileged text. She accords it all the authority of a definitive verdict from an impartial court. It was neither.

It is unsound scholarship to attempt an uncritical reading of any trial whose conviction was later overturned on appeal. Abundant evidence confirms that the original verdict was rigged and that parts of its transcript were falsified. Warner barely acknowledges the retrial and offers little pretext for disregarding it. This is the reverse of proper analysis.

If the twenty-five year gap between trials is an excuse for Warner's preference, then consistency demands that Warner accord still higher value to surviving letters from Joan of Arc's own lifetime. She is not consistent.

A newcomer to Joan of Arc biography would do far better with Regine Pernoud's "Joan of Arc by Herself and Her Witnesses." Pernoud's approach is to offer the reader relevant excerpts from original historic documents. Organized thematically, Pernoud summarizes leading debates and invites readers to reach their own conclusions. The work is admirably impartial. Pernoud is perhaps the most respected twentieth century scholar of Joan of Arc.
19 of 24 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars fair play and the interpretation of a legend 10 April 2000
By Julia Walker - Published on
Warner's book has more archival material and historical background detail than any other single work in this price-range or level of reader-access. Yes, Warner also presents opinions, as scholar/critics tend to do.
If, however, you turn to Regine Pernoud for an "unbiased" version of Joan's life -- whatever that might be -- you are on much more dangerous ground. Pernoud conveys opinion by omission; if a document is at odds with her reading of Joan's life or actions, she simply ignores it, leaving it unmentioned. An example of this is a crucial letter Joan dictated on the necessity of taking Paris. Yes, Pernoud IS French (or rather, she was), and she writes as though she has on-line access to 15th-century feelings and personal opinions -- a big problem, in my view. But Pernoud's relentlessly pro-Charles interpretation of events is much more distorting and misleading than anything generated by Warner's British feminism, which is fairly presented as the lense through which the material will be viewed.
If you want another good book on Joan, try Charles Wood's study of Joan and Richard II.
No one scholar is going to write a book which satisfies everyone on such a complex figure. But Warner is a good place to start reading and/or thinking about Joan of Arc.
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Not recommended. 28 Feb 2000
By A Customer - Published on
This book appears to follow the currently trendy practice of piling up all of the collected dead wood of past opinions while largely ignoring the evidence - evidence which is exhaustive and indisputable in the case of Joan of Arc. We know that she was not a 'rebel against the Church' - that was proven by the Inquisition at the Rehabilitation Trial in the 1450s (the presiding Inquisitor at this trial described her as a martyr for the Catholic faith, for heaven's sake). We know that she wore male clothing only to protect herself against sexual abuse - that was also proven by the testimony at the retrial, and echoed at many points in Joan's own testimony at the Condemnation Trial in 1431. Her political opponents tried to claim otherwise, as does Marina Warner; but they should have known better than that.
Ironically, the prologue tells us that "unlike a fictional character, she does not belong to the mind of a writer... She has objective reality". Quite true. So why not let that objective reality shine forth through the fog of opinion, bias, and propaganda? All I can say is: there are other authors who are far more honest with the facts.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Not a summer beach book 16 Jun 2000
By A Customer - Published on
Joan of Arc is interesting and informative. It is not, however, an ordinary history book. I enjoyed the first half of the book; Ms. Warner looks at all of the information in creative ways that don't ordinarily appear in most history books. The problem many people will have is that this is not just a history book. It deals with the perception of Joan as an icon, heroine or whatever(It is subtitled The Image of Female Heroism). The problem for me came with the second half of the book. Most readers will not enjoy the examination of semantics, symbolism, Jung, and any of the countless mythical and historical figures. I say all of this despite the fact that I was prepared to criticise the other critics in the review section. I thought perhaps they resented the feminist angle. After reading the whole book I can say that the second half will wear you out; it is a tough read only for those with more interest or intellect than myself.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category