Take note please - these are the views of an unregenerate Gentile.
Consider this Quote :
"The pentecostal stream would have to relinquish the unbiblical notion of two 'receptions' of the Spirit,one 'subsequent' to initiation..." (Chapter 7)
The PENTECOSTAL rediscovery (so to speak) of a biblical,OBSERVABLE,CONSCIOUS baptism in the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:4,Acts 8:18) was a tremendous step in the right direction - alas,Pentecostals adopted the Cessationist idea of an UNCONSCIOUS,automatic indwelling/RECEPTION,at the moment of conversion. Consequently,Pentecostals view baptism in the Holy Spirit as a seperate and 'subsequent' event. This is the key problem David addresses in the book (as well as the Pentecostal understanding that baptism in the Holy Spirit is primarily for power to serve and witness). Also,Pentecostals have a tendency to use the word 'fire' (right,left and center) as if the PRIMARY meaning in Holy Scripture was the ZEAL of the SAVED rather than the JUDGEMENT of the WICKED/LOST - ultimately in the Lake of Fire ; ABOVE ALL,in a way that does not reflect the PRIMARY way 'fire' is used by Messiah Jesus. Yes,a biblical case can be made for using 'fire' in the sense of zeal ; more so in the sense of purification - but that said,if the INTENDED weight of the word is not to be reduced,should followers of Messiah Jesus not be MIRRORING His usage of 'fire' ? (See also Messiah's use of 'thrown'/'cast' - Matthew 5:22,29/18:8/25:41;John 15:6 ; Revelation 14:9-11/20:15/21:7-8.) David mentions this tendency,thereby shedding light on the (somewhat puzzling) uncertainty of John the Baptist while in prison (Compare John 1:29-34 with Matthew 11:2-3 and Luke 7:19-20 ). As Michael L Brown rightly says in Our Hands Are Stained with Blood,we are not to say 'Israel' means one thing in Romans 11:25,and another in Romans 11:26. Well likewise,who are we to think fire means one thing in Matthew 3:10,12/Luke 3:16,but something else in Matthew 3:11/Luke 3:17 ! How should disciples PRIMARILY use 'fire' ? Should it not be in the same way as Messiah Jesus ?
Consider this quote :
"I [David Pawson,prior to 1964] had neither a conscious relationship with the Holy Spirit nor any direct experience of his power...most of my hearers were in the same boat." (Prologue)
With 'CESSATIONISTIC' preaching (on the other hand),it is not just what they say that is the problem,it is also what they DON'T : baptism in the Holy Spirit was a PRIMARY message of John the Baptist ; baptism in the Holy Spirit has a place of PROMINENCE in Acts,the Apostles sought to remedy any lack thereof immediately - yet,I believe you could go a long time before a Cessationist spoke on this matter of primacy and prominence. That absence of teaching speaks VOLUMES ! If,as Cessationists believe,Acts 8:4-25 and 10:1-48 are one-off 'mini Pentecosts' to inaugurate different people groups into the Body (Samaritans and Gentiles respectively),what new group existed at Corinth ?! Note Paul's instruction to ONGOINGLY and ZEALOUSLY covet these SPIRITUAL gifts (NOT natural abilities or aquired skills) ; even to base assembly practice around them - 1 Corinthians 12:1-11,28 and 14:26-33.
The book is TREMENDOUS,and VERY challenging for both Pentescostal and Cessationist alike. David Pawson was converted around 1947,aged 17,but it was not until 1964 that he understood what it was to RECEIVE and be BAPTISED in the Holy Spirit in a manner consistent with Acts 2:4/8:18/10:44-47/19:6,the prologue contains his testimony ; he does not want anyone else to have to wait that long. His own inadequate initiation perhaps explains why making sure converts are 'properly birthed' is one of the biggest burdens of his life.
There are another two COMPLEMENTARY works by David on this (with some measure of overlap between the three) : The Normal Christian Birth: How to Give New Believers a Proper Start in Life and Word and Spirit Together.
A well-rounded,WEIGHTY (outside the box/wineskin) understanding of the narrow Way comes from OBJECTIVE personal study of Holy Scripture ; outside of those INSPIRED words,some books (like bricks) collectively serve to build a fallible but robust defence against some of the (sincere or insincere) SUBJECTIVE misconceptions that have arisen over the last 1900 years. Everything written in that collection (indeed in any book about the narrow Way) must be tested by Holy Scripture,by God's TRUTH - not men's (well-intentioned,but) UNINSPIRED wineskins ; above all,by the words of the One Teacher - the Messiah (Matthew 23:10). One side of the INSPIRED Bible coin (so to speak) can lead to legalism or license - it takes BOTH sides of the TRUTH to properly nourish and equip a Second Covenant soldier of Messiah Jesus. This book on the PRIMARY message of John the Baptist and the need for an authentic RECEPTION of the Holy Spirit,is one of the collection.
(The Bible coin : Matthew 4:5-6/Matthew 4:7 ; John 3:17/Acts 10:42 ; John 3:16/Luke 13:3 ; Mark 8:12/Hebrews 2:4 ; John 6:37/Luke 14:26 ; Matthew 11: 30/ Luke 14:25-35 ; Acts 2:38/Acts 19:2 ; 1 Corinthians 14:18,26-33/1 Corinthians 14:19,40 ; Titus 3:5/Ephesians 2:10 ; John 1:17/Matthew 28:20 ; Matthew 7:1-5/1 Corinthians 5:9-13 ; John 10:11/John 12:24 ; John 10:10/1 Corinthians 5:14-15 ; 1 Thessalonians 1:10/Revelation 6:9-11 ; 1 John 1:6-9/Hebrews 10:26-31 ; Romans 8:11/John 15:6 ; Romans 8:30/Romans 11:11,19-22 ; 1 John 4:18/1 Peter 1:17 - and so on.)
Take note please - these are the views of an unregenerate Gentile.