|
Special Offers and Product Promotions
- Jubilee offer: spend £10 or more on any product sold by Amazon.co.uk on or before June 6 and you can buy The Diamond Jubilee A Classical Celebration Album for just £2.50 Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
Frequently Bought Together
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Product details
|
Reviews
DVD Description
In the 19th Century-set story, Jane Eyre (Mia Wasikowska) suddenly flees Thornfield Hall, the vast and isolated estate where she works as a governess for Adèle Varens, a child under the custody of Thornfield’s brooding master, Edward Rochester (Michael Fassbender). The imposing residence – and Rochester’s own imposing nature – have sorely tested her resilience. With nowhere else to go, she is extended a helping hand by clergyman St. John Rivers (Jamie Bell) and his family. As she recuperates in the Rivers’ Moor House and looks back upon the tumultuous events that led to her escape, Jane wonders if the past is ever truly past…
Special Features:
Special Features:
- Director’s Commentary
- Deleted Scenes
- A Look Inside Jane Eyre
- To Score Jane Eyre: Cary Fukunaga and Dario Marianelli Team Up
- The Mysterious Light of Jane Eyre
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
72 of 74 people found the following review helpful
Format:Blu-ray
This film had been well reviewed before I went to see it, and I expected it to be good. In effect, it exceeded expectations. It is generally true to the spirit of the novel and does not 'mess about' with it at all, though the chronology is changed - we start (very dramatically) with Jane's flight from Thornfield after the aborted 'wedding' and learn about her troubled past through flashback. That works fine. Her time at Lowood is rather briefly dealt with, but the essence is caught and the scenes with Helen Burns are moving. The film is often very beautiful visually, with breathtaking scenes of Jane standing alone at crosstracks wondering which way to go, crossing a huge moorland landscape alone as darkness threatens, making her way through misty trees to post letters (and thereby meeting Rochester), of Rochester hurrying after her over a bridge to propose (a scene echoed rather poignantly later), of Jane's lonely schoolhouse in late evening, of Jane in a darkened room trying to view a framed drawing by candlelight. The film is particularly good in the 'Gothic' scenes by night at Thornfield, where strange sounds - laughter, screams - are heard and Jane makes her way along corridors to investigate ; indeed, the reality of day-to-day living in a place like Thornfield in the mid 19th. century is very well conveyed.
Jane's relationship with Rochester - on the face of it, an unlikely one - is, of course, a central pillar of the novel, and in this film it pretty well works. That it does so is the result of some clever scripting (the script echoes nicely Charlotte Bronte's words at many points) and some very good work from Mia Wasikowska (Jane) and Michael Fassbender (Rochester). Wasikowska has been made to look exactly the part, a plain but interesting girl with an extraordinary face and range of thoughts and feelings expressed, usually, through very limited facial gesture. It's impressive. Young Jane, played by Amelia Clarkson, is also very good. Fassbender likewise does a good job with a complex, outwardly forbidding, tormented character with whom we have to empathise, and we do. Mrs. Fairfax is Judi Dench - almost enough said ; she conveys exactly the right mix of conscientiousness, loyalty and kindliness. Jamie Bell in the rather ungrateful role of St. John Rivers - good to the point of obsession and emotionally colourblind - is fine. This all works well.
I'm trying to think if there was anything I didn't like about the film, but I don't think there was. Of course it could have been done in a different way at all sorts of points, and indeed it has in the many previous adaptations, some very good. But I think this is an intelligent and compelling film which most people would greatly enjoy. I did.
Jane's relationship with Rochester - on the face of it, an unlikely one - is, of course, a central pillar of the novel, and in this film it pretty well works. That it does so is the result of some clever scripting (the script echoes nicely Charlotte Bronte's words at many points) and some very good work from Mia Wasikowska (Jane) and Michael Fassbender (Rochester). Wasikowska has been made to look exactly the part, a plain but interesting girl with an extraordinary face and range of thoughts and feelings expressed, usually, through very limited facial gesture. It's impressive. Young Jane, played by Amelia Clarkson, is also very good. Fassbender likewise does a good job with a complex, outwardly forbidding, tormented character with whom we have to empathise, and we do. Mrs. Fairfax is Judi Dench - almost enough said ; she conveys exactly the right mix of conscientiousness, loyalty and kindliness. Jamie Bell in the rather ungrateful role of St. John Rivers - good to the point of obsession and emotionally colourblind - is fine. This all works well.
I'm trying to think if there was anything I didn't like about the film, but I don't think there was. Of course it could have been done in a different way at all sorts of points, and indeed it has in the many previous adaptations, some very good. But I think this is an intelligent and compelling film which most people would greatly enjoy. I did.
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
I have to say I absolutely adored this film. It tells the story of Jane Eyre, hired as Governess to a French child in a rather odd Yorkshire household, owned by the mysterious Mr. Rochester. The centrepiece of the story is the development of the relationship between Jane and Rochester, which changes gradually from master/servant to mutual respect and understanding to an impassioned love, and the obstacles that are thrown in their path by Rochester's capricious nature and secret past.
The film works on several levels - the actors do a splendid job of portraying the characters and what passes between them, both spoken and unspoken. Mia Wasikowska is especially impressive as Jane, with her quiet dignity, inner strength and sense of resolve. An ordinary woman, but one whose spell it would be easy to fall under. Also the sense of atmosphere the director has managed to imbue the piece with is quite something. You get a real sense of the loneliness and bleakness of Jane's life, seemingly represented by the stunning landscape of the Yorkshire Moors. You feel the darkness of Rochester's house, the sense of secrets lurking under the surface, the unease in the surroundings. You feel the joy and light when Jane and Rochester finally get it together, and the intense pain as his past prevents their union. It's a great piece of film making, and really does justice to Charlotte Bronte's great book.
5 stars, no hesitation.
The film works on several levels - the actors do a splendid job of portraying the characters and what passes between them, both spoken and unspoken. Mia Wasikowska is especially impressive as Jane, with her quiet dignity, inner strength and sense of resolve. An ordinary woman, but one whose spell it would be easy to fall under. Also the sense of atmosphere the director has managed to imbue the piece with is quite something. You get a real sense of the loneliness and bleakness of Jane's life, seemingly represented by the stunning landscape of the Yorkshire Moors. You feel the darkness of Rochester's house, the sense of secrets lurking under the surface, the unease in the surroundings. You feel the joy and light when Jane and Rochester finally get it together, and the intense pain as his past prevents their union. It's a great piece of film making, and really does justice to Charlotte Bronte's great book.
5 stars, no hesitation.
31 of 33 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
I saw this film a couple of weeks ago, but yesterday I went to Cheltenham Literature Festival and I saw the screen writer, Moira Buffini, talk about how she adapted this work of classic literature to the screen. Having now heard how she made the decisions that she did, it has made me want to return to the film to see it with new eyes.
For lovers of the novel, please don't come to this film expecting everything to be the same. As Moira explained, trying to condense a novel of 500 odd pages into a two hour film, you have to realise that some things are going to have to be sacrificed or altered slightly. Also, as the novel is told in the first person narrative style, a screen writer has the unenviable task of puttin into images what is going on internally for the main character. As Moira said, showing a young woman crying in a garden has a completely different feel to showing a crying woman on a moor. Without giving too much away, Moira decided to begin the film with Jane fleeing Thornfield, so that we are then pulled straight into her story. In this way, we see that Jane is a mystery to the Rivers family, but also we see her as being emotionally open to us. Moira also explained why she chose to use so little of the scenes with Bertha that they shot - if you see the film, you will notice that Bertha does not appear very much at all. As Moira explained, Bertha was not known to Jane; she only became fully aware of her existence when she marries Rochester. Also, she wanted to present Bertha as a mad woman, not a monster.
I really enjoyed this adaptation. It is certainly refreshing to see actors of the right age playing the roles of Rochester and Jane. Do not come to this film expecting it to be exactly like the novel - it can't be. But is a damn good adaptation.
For lovers of the novel, please don't come to this film expecting everything to be the same. As Moira explained, trying to condense a novel of 500 odd pages into a two hour film, you have to realise that some things are going to have to be sacrificed or altered slightly. Also, as the novel is told in the first person narrative style, a screen writer has the unenviable task of puttin into images what is going on internally for the main character. As Moira said, showing a young woman crying in a garden has a completely different feel to showing a crying woman on a moor. Without giving too much away, Moira decided to begin the film with Jane fleeing Thornfield, so that we are then pulled straight into her story. In this way, we see that Jane is a mystery to the Rivers family, but also we see her as being emotionally open to us. Moira also explained why she chose to use so little of the scenes with Bertha that they shot - if you see the film, you will notice that Bertha does not appear very much at all. As Moira explained, Bertha was not known to Jane; she only became fully aware of her existence when she marries Rochester. Also, she wanted to present Bertha as a mad woman, not a monster.
I really enjoyed this adaptation. It is certainly refreshing to see actors of the right age playing the roles of Rochester and Jane. Do not come to this film expecting it to be exactly like the novel - it can't be. But is a damn good adaptation.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Amazing...i loved it!
I thought the chemistry was really good between the two main characters and due to the tricky situation with timing on a feature film it did credit to the amazing story in the... Read more
Published 21 hours ago by Dove
The worst Jane Eyre Movie
I purchased this upon reading the reviews, but did not live up to expectations. Jane Eyre the actress is the dullest, most expressionless actress I have ever seen. Read more
Published 7 days ago by wilson mbao
A pared down Eyre's tale of woe
Jane Eyre,the new film by Fukunaga,is an attempt to take a well-worn subject by an outsider new film-maker, shows a film faithful to its source material,while Buffini's screenplay... Read more
Published 8 days ago by technoguy
This Film Deserves Another 5-Star Review!!
I reviewed this on my blog last year, after watching it twice at the cinema. I was very disappointed with the 2006 BBC miniseries, particularly with the two main characters, who... Read more
Published 10 days ago by E. Maley
Cruel, Passionless And Truly Dreadful BLU RAY Picture Quality...
Ten minutes into this painfully laboured dreck and I knew I'd misspent my money. Forty minutes in and I could stand it no more... Read more
Published 10 days ago by Mark Barry, Reckless Records, London
Classic Entertainment
A modern twist on a classic story.A little bit different from all the other Jane Eyre films I have seen in the past. Read more
Published 17 days ago by Pyewacket
good but...
I've got seven versions of "Jane Eyer" since 1940 with Joan Fontaine and Orson Wells. The most adaptation is with Timothy Dalton et Zelah Clarke, closer to the book of Charlotte... Read more
Published 25 days ago by kaouen
Disappointed
I ordered this DVD for my Mom and was really looking forward to watching it. We were both really disappointed with the film. Read more
Published 1 month ago by Lyrad
Problem with sub-titles
Poor sound and impossible to access the sub-titles, which I normally use. Speedy and efficient replacement by Amazon, but the second copy is no better. Read more
Published 1 month ago by P. Madgwick
Compare jane Eyre
Very disappointed in the remake of Jane Eyre. For me it wasn't a patch on the Old film starring Orson Wells & Joan Fontaine.
Published 1 month ago by cornflake
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
