I have yet to see a bad review of the Glagolitic Mass, but my introduction to it was most unfortunate: My wife and I were listening to a concert on the car radio without having any idea of which work was being performed (we missed the first two movements). After about five minutes, we both started to feel irritated, without quite knowing why, but after two more movements my wife noticed that every single phrase was repeated exactly - at least from a rhythmic point of view - and after about ten minutes, we felt that the whole work was beginning to sound entirely predictable, and we did, indeed, begin to sing ahead of the actual performance, to see if this would prove to be the case. Sadly it did prove to be the case, and after scratching my head for a few more minutes, I said to my wife, "If someone forced me to put a composer's name to this piece, I would have to say that it sounds like really bad Janacek, and the only alternatives to that which I can think of would have to be that the work is by: a) one of his worst students, b) a work by Janacek himself when he was 13 years old, or c) a work by Janacek himself when he was on his death-bed and no longer capable of rational thought". I'm sorry to have had to say this, especially in the light of the fact that I know several other works of his, including other works from the same period of his life, and I very much enjoy listening to them. But I thought the work in question was simply unusually bad for a composer with such a reputation. Perhaps the performance was atrocious, but I'm not very excited at the prospect of giving it another chance. If you'll just give me a year or two to recover...