- Jubilee offer: spend £10 or more on any product sold by Amazon.co.uk on or before June 6 and you can buy The Diamond Jubilee A Classical Celebration Album for just £2.50 Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
| ||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
James II (1633-1701) lacked the charisma of his father, Charles I, but shared his tendency to dismiss the views of others when they differed from his own. Failing to understand his subjects, James was also misunderstood by them. In this highly-regarded biography, John Miller reassesses James II and his reign, drawing on a wide array of primary sources from France, Italy, and Ireland as well as England. Miller argues that the king had many laudable attributes -- he was brave, loyal, honorable, and hard-working, and he was at least as benevolent toward his people as his father had been. Yet James's conversion to Catholicism fueled the distrust of his Protestant subjects who placed the worst possible construction on his actions and statements. Although James came to see the securing of religious freedom for Catholics in the wider context of freedom for all religious minorities, his people naturally doubted the sincerity of his commitment to toleration.
The book explores James's relations with the state and society, focusing on the political, diplomatic, and religious issues that shaped his reign. Miller discusses the human failings, the gulf of understanding between the king and his subjects, and the sheer bad luck that led to James's downfall. He also considers the reasons for James's lack of interest in recovering his kingdom after his flight to France in 1688. This revised edition of the book includes a substantial new foreword assessing recent work on the reign.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
At midnight on 14th October, 1633, Henrietta Maria, Queen of England, gave birth to a son at St James's Palace. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
At midnight on 14th October, 1633, Henrietta Maria, Queen of England, gave birth to a son at St James's Palace. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
The English Monarchs series has brought the highest standards of historical scholarship to the wide audience. Leading historians scrutinize the lives of the kings and queens of England and explore the cumulative impact of the longest permanent governing institution in Europe.
James II (1633-1701) lacked the charisma of his father, Charles I, but shared his tendency to dismiss the views of others when they differed from his own. Failing to understand his subjects, James was also misunderstood by them. John Miller reassesses James II and argues that the king had many laudable attributes--he was brave, loyal, honorable, and hard-working, and he was at least as benevolent toward his people as his father had been. Yet James's conversion to Catholicism fueled the distrust of his Protestant subjects who placed the worst possible construction on his actions and statements. Although James came to see the securing of religious freedom for Catholics in the wider context of freedom for all religious minorities, his people naturally doubted the sincerity of his commitment to toleration.
The book explores James's relations with the state and society, focusing on the political, diplomatic, and religious issues that shaped his reign. Miller discusses the human failings, the gulf of understanding between the king and his subjects. He also considers the reasons for James's lack of interest in recovering his kingdom after his flight to France in 1688.
For me I discovered new angels and I have become more subtle in my judgement of him, but still I think he was the most silly of all British kings. Nevertheless, I enjoyed studying the reign of James II again and this book is simply excellent:the book is a great reading for anyone with an interest in the politics and culture of this very period of British history.
James II (1633-1701) lacked the charisma of his father, Charles I, but shared his tendency to dismiss the views of others when they differed from his own. Failing to understand his subjects, James was also misunderstood by them. John Miller reassesses James II and argues that the king had many laudable attributes--he was brave, loyal, honorable, and hard-working, and he was at least as benevolent toward his people as his father had been. Yet James's conversion to Catholicism fueled the distrust of his Protestant subjects who placed the worst possible construction on his actions and statements. Although James came to see the securing of religious freedom for Catholics in the wider context of freedom for all religious minorities, his people naturally doubted the sincerity of his commitment to toleration.
The book explores James's relations with the state and society, focusing on the political, diplomatic, and religious issues that shaped his reign. Miller discusses the human failings, the gulf of understanding between the king and his subjects. He also considers the reasons for James's lack of interest in recovering his kingdom after his flight to France in 1688.
For me I discovered new angels and I have become more subtle in my judgement of him, but still I think he was the most silly of all British kings. Nevertheless, I enjoyed studying the reign of James II again and this book is simply excellent:the book is a great reading for anyone with an interest in the politics and culture of this very period of British history.
0 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
I am interested in British history, so this item was a useful book for the porpose.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
3 reviews
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
fair-minded and authoritative account of James' reign
21 Mar 2005
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
James II has been vilified as representing monarchical absolutism and militant Catholicism almost since the 1688 revolution. How such a tyrant could have been
Removed from power by a bloodless coup (in England at any rate) sits somewhat uneasily with the accepted wisdom. Miller paints a more complex picture of James eventful early life - escaping from Cromwell, shadowing his elder brother around Europe. He gives a fair account of James prowess as a naval commander and his organisational and administrative skills in the later years of the reign Charles II.
James was torn between his complete loyalty to Charles and his conversion to Catholicism in the 1680's, Charles also showed both exasperation and loyalty towards his rather awkward brother - preferring Monmouth, his natural (though not legitimate) son, but insisting that James be his successor, despite increasingly virulent opposition.
James came to view the fact of his succession - despite many travails, false alarms in terms of Charles producing a legitimate heir, and almost hysterical Whig opposition - as a sign of divine favour. Miller also points out that , for most of his reign James accepted that William of Orange - a Protestant married to his Protestant daughter, Mary - would be his successor. This gave impetus to James to improve the plight of his co-religionists and explains his haste to do so. However Parliamentary opposition to an Act of Toleration led James both to use his power to dispense with Parliamentary acts for particular individuals and to attempt to shape Parliamentary support for his proposals. Both acts were interpreted (after the Revolution) as proof of his authoritarianism. His need for a standing army became an even great cause for concern as he began to nominate more Catholic officers. In actual fact Miller shows James as acting in the tradition of the later years of Charles' rule - attempting to influence the selection and election of loyal parliamentarians, and Miller argues that James' view on legislation, dispensing and suspending powers were at least legally arguable. James did overstep the mark by attempting to populate the judiciary with loyalists (or toadies).
Miller's view however is that having succeeded in getting the most loyal parliament in 1685, James failed to recognize the limits of his parliamentary support.
Having failed to win parliament to toleration, he believed he could again reshape parliament to elect people more amenable to toleration. In this he was, to say the least, poorly advised; and this effort, combined with its consequent attack on the Church of England, led to the fall off in support which led to the invitation to William of Orange to come and help sort out the situation.
Once William landed - undeterred by French threats, the English Navy and Winter weather - James' belief in Providence seems to have collapsed and he viewed the subsequent desertions by his family and officers as a Divine punishment for past sins.
His subsequent years seemed almost to embrace the failure to regain his position and he was viewed by Louis XIV as a figure of sympathy and pity.
Millers scholarship and use of direct contemporary sources is most comprehensive, his judgements of James are clear, direct and credible. This is a book to be cherished.
Removed from power by a bloodless coup (in England at any rate) sits somewhat uneasily with the accepted wisdom. Miller paints a more complex picture of James eventful early life - escaping from Cromwell, shadowing his elder brother around Europe. He gives a fair account of James prowess as a naval commander and his organisational and administrative skills in the later years of the reign Charles II.
James was torn between his complete loyalty to Charles and his conversion to Catholicism in the 1680's, Charles also showed both exasperation and loyalty towards his rather awkward brother - preferring Monmouth, his natural (though not legitimate) son, but insisting that James be his successor, despite increasingly virulent opposition.
James came to view the fact of his succession - despite many travails, false alarms in terms of Charles producing a legitimate heir, and almost hysterical Whig opposition - as a sign of divine favour. Miller also points out that , for most of his reign James accepted that William of Orange - a Protestant married to his Protestant daughter, Mary - would be his successor. This gave impetus to James to improve the plight of his co-religionists and explains his haste to do so. However Parliamentary opposition to an Act of Toleration led James both to use his power to dispense with Parliamentary acts for particular individuals and to attempt to shape Parliamentary support for his proposals. Both acts were interpreted (after the Revolution) as proof of his authoritarianism. His need for a standing army became an even great cause for concern as he began to nominate more Catholic officers. In actual fact Miller shows James as acting in the tradition of the later years of Charles' rule - attempting to influence the selection and election of loyal parliamentarians, and Miller argues that James' view on legislation, dispensing and suspending powers were at least legally arguable. James did overstep the mark by attempting to populate the judiciary with loyalists (or toadies).
Miller's view however is that having succeeded in getting the most loyal parliament in 1685, James failed to recognize the limits of his parliamentary support.
Having failed to win parliament to toleration, he believed he could again reshape parliament to elect people more amenable to toleration. In this he was, to say the least, poorly advised; and this effort, combined with its consequent attack on the Church of England, led to the fall off in support which led to the invitation to William of Orange to come and help sort out the situation.
Once William landed - undeterred by French threats, the English Navy and Winter weather - James' belief in Providence seems to have collapsed and he viewed the subsequent desertions by his family and officers as a Divine punishment for past sins.
His subsequent years seemed almost to embrace the failure to regain his position and he was viewed by Louis XIV as a figure of sympathy and pity.
Millers scholarship and use of direct contemporary sources is most comprehensive, his judgements of James are clear, direct and credible. This is a book to be cherished.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Strong biography of James
11 Jan 2012
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
John Miller's main thesis in this biography is that the major failing of James II was lack of intellectual ability and an accompanying stubbornness regarding many of his personal beliefs. I find that Miller argues his thesis well. James seemed incapable of understanding the effects of his actions on those who disagreed with him. His strength, as Miller notes, was his military prowess and courage. It seemed to be the one area where James actually felt comfortable. But this did not at all translate into astute political leadership. I had two specific positive reactions to this book. First, it changed my incorrect view of James as a hardened tyrant. With a couple notable exceptions (the "Cameronians" in Scotland and the reaction in the West to Monmouth's rebellion), James was not prone to killing or persecuting those who disagreed with him. He just never understood them. His motives may not have been pure - his actions were often in the interest of keeping his Catholicism from becoming an issue. Nevertheless, the fairly common view of James, for example, the image given in Locke's beautiful Letter Concerning Toleration, is somewhat misleading. Possibly the Anglicans were right and James was ready to be brutal in imposing his views on others if he only had absolute power. However, Miller makes a good case that throughout his life James was much more accepting than commonly thought and that particular character trait followed him into the kingship. His motives may well have been tied to a certain type of ignorance and a failure of leadership but James was no Henry VIII.
The second positive response to the book was the way in which Miller highlights the power of James's conversion to Catholicism. His was a mind and set of emotions that felt absolutely secure in the highly structured Catholic world of his day. Everything is interpreted by James as God's will for him. This tended to make him stubborn and blind to those who may have seen God's will differently. The clash in his character, and the vacillations in his actions, between his belief in letting other people be and his absolute Catholic beliefs comes out time and again in the book. This often led to indecision and errors in actions which, when they failed, were again God's way of punishing him and, for him, had of course nothing to do with his own limited thought processes. James's vacillations between firmness and reconciliation, between trying to gain the support of Anglicans one day and Dissenters the next, was in the end not leadership at all. He never read well the response of others and this kind of intellectual blindness eventually did him in.
Miller's book draws out the complications that did exist in this uncomplex man. His complexities, such as they were, were the result of his simplicity. William's invasion was not just a return to the status quo in terms of those who wielded the power in England. It was also a reassertion of intelligent leadership. It was a reinforcement of the truth that the ship of state cannot function without a captain who knows what he is doing. This is a fine biography.
The second positive response to the book was the way in which Miller highlights the power of James's conversion to Catholicism. His was a mind and set of emotions that felt absolutely secure in the highly structured Catholic world of his day. Everything is interpreted by James as God's will for him. This tended to make him stubborn and blind to those who may have seen God's will differently. The clash in his character, and the vacillations in his actions, between his belief in letting other people be and his absolute Catholic beliefs comes out time and again in the book. This often led to indecision and errors in actions which, when they failed, were again God's way of punishing him and, for him, had of course nothing to do with his own limited thought processes. James's vacillations between firmness and reconciliation, between trying to gain the support of Anglicans one day and Dissenters the next, was in the end not leadership at all. He never read well the response of others and this kind of intellectual blindness eventually did him in.
Miller's book draws out the complications that did exist in this uncomplex man. His complexities, such as they were, were the result of his simplicity. William's invasion was not just a return to the status quo in terms of those who wielded the power in England. It was also a reassertion of intelligent leadership. It was a reinforcement of the truth that the ship of state cannot function without a captain who knows what he is doing. This is a fine biography.
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Incomplete
3 Dec 2006
Format:Paperback
The life of James II is extremely intriguing: flight from England early in life, prowess as a miltary commander, conversion to Catholism, and eventual ouster in favor of William III and James' protestant daughters. Sadly, this biography does not cover in detail any of these fascinating events. Rather, Miller's focus is solely on the relationships between James, his brother, his chief advisors, Parliament, and Louis XIV. A reader unfamiliar with the political climate of the later 17th century will have difficulty enjoying this book.
In my opinion, the political intrigues (clearly important in understanding James II) could have been interwoven with a personal study of James to produce a more compelling, and well rounded, biography of a largely unknown monarch.
In my opinion, the political intrigues (clearly important in understanding James II) could have been interwoven with a personal study of James to produce a more compelling, and well rounded, biography of a largely unknown monarch.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Biography > British Royalty
- Books > Biography > Historical > 1501-1700
- Books > Biography > Historical > Britain > Military
- Books > Biography > Historical > Britain > Tudors & Stuarts: 1501-1700
- Books > Biography > Historical > Countries & Regions > Europe
- Books > Biography > Historical > Royalty
- Books > Biography > Political > Britain
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > British Heads of State > James I
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > British Heads of State > James II
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > Early Modern 1501-1700 (Tudors, Stuarts, Commonwealth, Restoration, Glorious Revolution)
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > Ireland
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
