Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £6.50
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £6.50, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
"Must reading for anyone interested in the changing order in the Middle East and Islamic societies in general, and certainly for human rights activists with interest in the Muslim world."
Product Description
In this updated fourth edition, Mayer considers the human rights impact of the U. S. interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, the growing importance of Islamic contributions to the UN human rights system, and changing tides in Islamic thought in regard to human rights.
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
I read this excellent book when it first appeared, and thought then that it uncovered very well the essential hypocrisy that takes place when various Islamic declarations of human rights are issued. Mayer examines not just the English texts of several Arabic and Persian documents, but compares these with the Arabic and Persian (Farsi) originals. This comparison reveals serious contradictions that have a particular bearing on women and religious minorities. Where an English text may read 'women have full rights to employment', the Arabic will add 'subject to the laws of the shari'a', which automatically negates the English statement. Mayer is not one of those rather flakey Islamophobes who start from a premise that Islam is to blame for everything, but a well-qualified academic who knows this field thoroughly. This is a book that should be in the hands of all those involved in human rights work internationally or at home, of politicians, of NGOs, and, of course, of Muslim reformers who are trying to bring enlightenment into a very dark area.
4 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Excellent book, Mayer has carefully compared Islamic law with international human rights laws and concludes that these 2 are not compatible. This is due to fact that Islam is 'God's' commands and critisizing it is blasphemous...Mayer states that, 'Islamic human rights can offer no means for protecting the individual against laws and policies violating international human rights law'. Thus, Muslim -theocratic- States exist by asserting Islamic law at the deprivation of the freedoms of their citizens, female and male. Thus, violating their citizens' international human rights, with women suffering the most.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
5 reviews
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
On the Jeffersonian wall of separation between church and state in Middle Eastern societies
17 Oct 2005
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Ms Mayer does a very good job in this book. As correctly the author points out, the most accurate title would have been: "A Comparison of Selected Civil and Political Rights Formulations in International Law and in Actual and Proposed Rights Schemes Purporting to Embody Islamic Principles, with a critical Appraisal of the Latter in Terms of International Law and Islamic Jurisprudence and Relevant State Practice". The Human Rights Schemes meant to embody Islamic Principles and reviewed by the author are: 1) The 1981 Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights; 2) "The Draft of the Islamic constitution" published in 1979 on the Azhar journal Majallat al-Azhar; 3) The 1979 Iranian Constitution; 4) The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam presented at the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna; 5) The Basic Law of Saudi Arabia of 1992; 6) A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by Sultanhussein Tabandeh; 7) A pamphlet entitled Human Rights in Islam by the religious leader Abu'l A'la Mawdudi. Therefore, the author does not try to extract Human Rights principles from the Qur'an, since she assume that this job could have been done better by Islamic jurists through their human rights scheme.
The main thesis is that the premodern shari'a law did not conceive a modern state and therefore its potential abuses against men and women. Shari'a laws were not elaborated with a view to provide institutional mechanisms to deal with cases where governments disregarded Islamic law and oppressed its subjects. Islamic thought stressed not the rights of citizens but their duties to obey God. The implicit assumption is that both ruler and ruled were obedient to God's commands. If this harmony is not satisfied, the Shari'a remains vague in its consequences. Whether the shari'a puts constitutional constraints on governments and safeguards for individual rights is a divisive issue, that in Middle Eastern despotic regimes is solved by recourse to tradition and the good ol' ways. According to Ms Mayer current Human rights schemes with built-in Islamic principles suffer from vagueness and are ineffective in providing real protection to human rights. The main outcome from this state of affairs is a consistent discrimination based on sex and religion. The author does not exclude that a combination of a more democratic environment and more rational interpretations of the Shari'a taking into due account the contemporary reality might generate a more effective outcomes. Without ignoring that each great religion contains important humanistic elements that anticipated our conception of human rights, a Jeffersonian wall of separation between church and state would provide a better and more friendly environment for a real and meaningful protection of rights and freedoms for all men and all women.
This book is highly recommended.
The main thesis is that the premodern shari'a law did not conceive a modern state and therefore its potential abuses against men and women. Shari'a laws were not elaborated with a view to provide institutional mechanisms to deal with cases where governments disregarded Islamic law and oppressed its subjects. Islamic thought stressed not the rights of citizens but their duties to obey God. The implicit assumption is that both ruler and ruled were obedient to God's commands. If this harmony is not satisfied, the Shari'a remains vague in its consequences. Whether the shari'a puts constitutional constraints on governments and safeguards for individual rights is a divisive issue, that in Middle Eastern despotic regimes is solved by recourse to tradition and the good ol' ways. According to Ms Mayer current Human rights schemes with built-in Islamic principles suffer from vagueness and are ineffective in providing real protection to human rights. The main outcome from this state of affairs is a consistent discrimination based on sex and religion. The author does not exclude that a combination of a more democratic environment and more rational interpretations of the Shari'a taking into due account the contemporary reality might generate a more effective outcomes. Without ignoring that each great religion contains important humanistic elements that anticipated our conception of human rights, a Jeffersonian wall of separation between church and state would provide a better and more friendly environment for a real and meaningful protection of rights and freedoms for all men and all women.
This book is highly recommended.
19 of 25 people found the following review helpful
Meticulously Documented Must Read
1 Mar 2002
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Ms. Mayer does the difficult scholarly work needed to shed light on the issue of the Muslim treatment of women. She goes directly to the original sources. It can be fairly said that Ms. Mayer's allows Islamic sources to speak for themselves. Everything is amply documented and footnoted to allow the reader to go to the specific document and confirm Ms. Mayer's statments.
Ms. Mayer reveals the differences between the English version and the Arabic translation of the "Islamic" human rights declaration. It is literally a two-faced document, the Arabic version containing limitations and derogations of women, while the English version appears to grant equality.
This is the book that Islamic apologists in the Western world need to read.
One can hope that someday in the future Islam will reform its treatment of women, but, unfortunately, according to many informed sources there is in effect an upsurge in fundamentalism in the Middle East and elsewhere which is taking Islam in the wrong direction.
Ms. Mayer reveals the differences between the English version and the Arabic translation of the "Islamic" human rights declaration. It is literally a two-faced document, the Arabic version containing limitations and derogations of women, while the English version appears to grant equality.
This is the book that Islamic apologists in the Western world need to read.
One can hope that someday in the future Islam will reform its treatment of women, but, unfortunately, according to many informed sources there is in effect an upsurge in fundamentalism in the Middle East and elsewhere which is taking Islam in the wrong direction.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Tensions between Islamic and International Law
14 April 2009
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Mayer assesses human rights in Islam by comparing Shariah law to international human rights standards. She usefully looks at the commentary of several Islamic scholars, as well as several case studies from countries that have adopted Islamic law, such as Sudan, Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. She shows the tensions between Islam and human rights, but also how they can (or should) be compatible. For example, she cites several scholars who question whether the Prophet Muhammad ever executed anybody for apostasy, as opposed to mere political treason.
Because the book covers so much ground, it can at times be superficial. However, it l paints a reasonably accurate picture of the tensions between the two legal systems and human rights challenges in the Muslim world.
Because the book covers so much ground, it can at times be superficial. However, it l paints a reasonably accurate picture of the tensions between the two legal systems and human rights challenges in the Muslim world.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > History > Countries & Regions > Asia > Middle East > Arabian Peninsula
- Books > History > Religious History > Islam
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Islam > Festivals > Eid
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Studies > Church & State
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Countries & Regions > Middle East
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Political Science & Ideology
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Government & Politics > Political Structure & Processes
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Social Sciences > Multicultural Studies > Islamic Studies
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
