Is Religion Dangerous?
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Trade in Is Religion Dangerous? for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
Many commentators today claim that religion is dangerous and harmful. In addressing this question, Keith Ward begins by defining what religion actually is and how most human harm has been caused. He then looks at why people say that religion is dangerous, focusing particularly on religious wars and conflicts and on specific attacks on religion, such as the claims that God is wrathful, that religion is intolerant, that religious morality is primitive and cruel. Keith Ward argues that religion produces great good - for exanple, in terms of hospitals, the abolition of slavery, great art and music, moral heroism, and philosophy and science. Religion, he concludes, is the best rational basis for morality.
About the Author
A well-known broadcaster and presenter, Professor Keith Ward's work is internationally respected and he is today known as one of Britain's foremost philosopher-theologians. Regius Professor of Divinity at the University of Oxford, Joint President of the World Congress of Faiths and a Fellow of the British Academy, he is the author of over 20 books, including God, Chance and Necessity.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
24 of 25 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Keith Ward is a relatively accessible writer, knowledgable and well worth reading. His style of writing leaves something to be desired, but that's only a minor point. In this book Ward explores the defence of religion before the criticism it has endured in recent years by the anti-theists who seek to prove it as dangerous.
This is a short book written to set some relatively straight forward but forgotten or misinterpreted facts in their right place. In light of the fashionable debate between atheists and religous figures about the danger of religious belief (refer to Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins for the atheist perspective), this is a very welcome sober contribution. Religion is not so easy to reduce to the status of a dangerous superstition, it turns out.
Framed simply, how is religion dangerous? If your first answer harks back to the Crusades, there's something in this book for you for sure. Though the value of Ward's work here shines through beyond that.
Having recently heard Ward speak on his promotional tour, I found out that he is an open and smart man. He speaks and writes clearly for the masses, which is valuable in itself, regardless of his conclusions, which incidentally aren't too far off the mark.
If you've been seduced by Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins or Daniel Dennet, give this a go. It won't cost you much, and it will certainly give you an alternative perspective. This is a defence of religion without asking you to convert. It is therefore a smart, ballsy and much needed addition to the ongoing theist - anti-theist debate.
This is a short book written to set some relatively straight forward but forgotten or misinterpreted facts in their right place. In light of the fashionable debate between atheists and religous figures about the danger of religious belief (refer to Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins for the atheist perspective), this is a very welcome sober contribution. Religion is not so easy to reduce to the status of a dangerous superstition, it turns out.
Framed simply, how is religion dangerous? If your first answer harks back to the Crusades, there's something in this book for you for sure. Though the value of Ward's work here shines through beyond that.
Having recently heard Ward speak on his promotional tour, I found out that he is an open and smart man. He speaks and writes clearly for the masses, which is valuable in itself, regardless of his conclusions, which incidentally aren't too far off the mark.
If you've been seduced by Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins or Daniel Dennet, give this a go. It won't cost you much, and it will certainly give you an alternative perspective. This is a defence of religion without asking you to convert. It is therefore a smart, ballsy and much needed addition to the ongoing theist - anti-theist debate.
27 of 31 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This excellently-written and very readable book has 200 pages dealing with this most modern of issues - is religion dangerous? Keith Ward explores how we define religion and the ways in which religions and groups can be seen to be `dangerous' where their intent might be quite the opposite.
I liked the way that he drew examples from all aspects of life and history - Christianity, Islam, Nazi Germany, the Crusades, Iraq, Quakers, Buddhism and more. This wide-ranging look at the world and the religions that are part of it, their history and form today and ways in which their followers can be dangerous was excellently portrayed.
His conclusion - that it's the human within the religion that is dangerous, not the religion itself - is perhaps not a surprise but his masterly arguments are well worth reading. A useful book to encourage thought and dialogue within Christianity and other religions.
I liked the way that he drew examples from all aspects of life and history - Christianity, Islam, Nazi Germany, the Crusades, Iraq, Quakers, Buddhism and more. This wide-ranging look at the world and the religions that are part of it, their history and form today and ways in which their followers can be dangerous was excellently portrayed.
His conclusion - that it's the human within the religion that is dangerous, not the religion itself - is perhaps not a surprise but his masterly arguments are well worth reading. A useful book to encourage thought and dialogue within Christianity and other religions.
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Is Religion Dangerous? Whatever your response to the question this book supplies points which will validate your answer and points which will challenge it. This would suggest that it is a fairly balanced book. Having said this, it does sit firmly on the monotheistic side of the fence. Ironically, it may be atheists who find this book most useful - particularly as a reminder that there are reasonable, religious people. Don't expect to like the whole book. Equally ironically, this book may cause greatest offence to any who see the bible as the literal truth. I'm sure there will be copies with bible verses scribbled into the margins. Quakers come out of it pretty well. I assume they will be happy.
I soon warmed to the author with his frank admission that Christianity has perpetrated some horrors in the past. This openness strikes me as an important basis for dialogue. It is refreshing not to encounter a defensive attitude.
This was balanced by times when I felt I was being subjected to a sales pitch for the author's version of a moderate, loving and reasonable Christianity. Some sections did have the feel of a personal credo.
He draws out an interesting contrast between Nazism and religions in that religions contain something which is potentially self-correcting where Nazism did not. Whereas Nazism was never likely to change its spots, religious atrocities might, potentially, be stopped from within.
At other points in the book I was reminded of the oft repeated phrase, `Communism is fine in theory but it doesn't work in practice.' I think it was Karl Popper who pointed out that this isn't really possible. If a theory doesn't work in practice then it was a poor theory to start with! In a similar way, Keith Ward does have a tendency to see religion as basically good but spoilt by those pesky people. He suggests (on page 197) that religion should be judged on its transformative power. To the extent that it is failing to transform real people in the real world then it is failing by these standards.
I feel that more space could have been devoted to non-theistic religions. Two pages are devoted to a discussion of Buddhism. However, a more general discussion of religion for those who find theistic belief unpalatable would have been both interesting and useful.
For an equally balanced account but from the atheistic perspective, I would recommend `Breaking the Spell' by Daniel Dennett.
I soon warmed to the author with his frank admission that Christianity has perpetrated some horrors in the past. This openness strikes me as an important basis for dialogue. It is refreshing not to encounter a defensive attitude.
This was balanced by times when I felt I was being subjected to a sales pitch for the author's version of a moderate, loving and reasonable Christianity. Some sections did have the feel of a personal credo.
He draws out an interesting contrast between Nazism and religions in that religions contain something which is potentially self-correcting where Nazism did not. Whereas Nazism was never likely to change its spots, religious atrocities might, potentially, be stopped from within.
At other points in the book I was reminded of the oft repeated phrase, `Communism is fine in theory but it doesn't work in practice.' I think it was Karl Popper who pointed out that this isn't really possible. If a theory doesn't work in practice then it was a poor theory to start with! In a similar way, Keith Ward does have a tendency to see religion as basically good but spoilt by those pesky people. He suggests (on page 197) that religion should be judged on its transformative power. To the extent that it is failing to transform real people in the real world then it is failing by these standards.
I feel that more space could have been devoted to non-theistic religions. Two pages are devoted to a discussion of Buddhism. However, a more general discussion of religion for those who find theistic belief unpalatable would have been both interesting and useful.
For an equally balanced account but from the atheistic perspective, I would recommend `Breaking the Spell' by Daniel Dennett.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Not for eveyone, but arguments have real merit
It is unlikely that this or any other book on this subject will sway anyone at either ends of the belief spectrum. Read more
Published on 16 May 2009 by pauljimmyn
For Christians only!
I found this a very lazy book. It was clearly not written to be read by a critical audience, but only by Christians who felt their position under fire and wanted to find a few... Read more
Published on 24 Feb 2008 by C. Baily
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
