Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up Audio CD – Audiobook, CD, Unabridged


See all 8 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
£26.23 £14.06

Trade In Promotion

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Audible.co.uk, an Amazon Company, is home to more than 100,000 audiobook downloads. Start a 30-day free trial today and get your first audiobook for FREE.




Product details

  • Audio CD
  • Publisher: Tantor Media, Inc; Unabridged edition (1 Feb. 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1400106303
  • ISBN-13: 978-1400106301
  • Product Dimensions: 16.3 x 2.8 x 13.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,910,752 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"He is as sure-footed as a tiger as he prowls through the theocratic landscape pouncing on sloppy thinking. To a large extent he succeeds in demolishing the arguments of believers." "--The News & Observer "(Raleigh) "Paulos . . . knocks the props from under the classic arguments for the existence of God . . . Written with a charming skepticism that is not off-putting or arrogant." --"Amicus Dei" --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

John Allen Paulos is a professor of mathematics at Temple University. His books include the bestseller "Innumeracy: Mathematical""Illiteracy and Its Consequences "(H&W, 1988), "A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market," and "A Mathematician Reads the Newspapers." --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Customer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

45 of 47 people found the following review helpful By Sphex on 24 July 2008
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
John Allen Paulos is not alone in having been intrigued by "questions of existence and belief" since childhood, but few of us will have feigned belief in Santa Claus in order to protect our parents from our "knowledge of his nonexistence". Unsurprisingly, Paulos suspects he has "an inborn disposition to materialism" (the "matter and motion are the basis of all there is" and not the "I want more cars and houses" kind). Don't let this put you off if you think there must be more to the universe than atoms and energy. While his opening question - "Are there any logical reasons to believe in God?" - will make some wretch or reach for the remote, curious atheists and theists will find "Irreligion" irresistible.

The book is organized into three parts: first come four classical arguments for God's existence, then four subjective arguments, and finally four "psycho-mathematical" arguments. It's worth emphasizing that these are arguments in the grown-up sense of offering reasons or evidence in support of a conclusion, and not simply statements of personal opinion. You're meant to take them seriously, to be prepared to change your mind if persuaded, and, if you disagree, to offer reasons why. Faith so often "wins" because it avoids the hard work of argument and plumps for wishful thinking to get to where it wants to go.

Each argument is clearly laid out, premises and conclusions enumerated and simplified so we see exactly what's going on. (This admirable quality, the will to explain and not obfuscate, is more often found in scientists and novelists than in theologians or pedlars of new age quackery, who cater for and prey upon the ignorance of those who "are more impressed by fatuous blather that they don't understand than by simple observations that they do".
Read more ›
7 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful By Stephen A. Haines HALL OF FAME on 9 July 2008
Format: Hardcover
Although titled "Irreligion", this book might is better typified by "Irrational". Paulos lines out the litany of weary old arguments in support of the deity now dominating Western society. Reading them simple, straightforward format, they seem more like excuses than arguments. There are a dozen of them, the Classical, the Subjective and the Psyche-Mathematical. Each has been addressed many times, of course, but Paulos' particular style of wit seems to breathe a new, if transient, life into them. Paulos' examination of each proposal is incisive and devastating, relying on a combination of a mathematician's logic and a showman's delivery.

In his Preface, Paulos states his skepticism emerged at an early age. He hasn't let it rest, working it to confront numerous situations. He early recognised the unanimity of things, which made him feel part of everything. Instead of attributing the universal relationship of matter to the supernatural, he turned instead to wondering why others did. In so doing he's accumulated a number of assertions purportedly supporting the notion of a deity. Each sets a condition, proposes an absurd - if frequently forwarded - supportive supposition to reach an unwarranted conclusion. A typical classic runs:

1. The world in general seems to evidence intention and direction

2. There must be a director behind this purpose

3. The entity directing must be a god, thereby proving its existence.

Paulos notes that the teleological argument goes back to ancient Greece, but is best typified today by William Paley's early 19th Century concept of "natural theology". That the idea remains current is a testimony to the failure of today's education or Western society's loss of a sense of logic.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By T. C. Wilkinson on 31 Oct. 2008
Format: Hardcover
First the good. It's extremely useful to have all these arguments and their refutations laid out in one place. Most treatments I have read tend to concentrate on the cosmological, teleological and ontological arguments. Here the author also deals with four subjective and four psycho-mathematical arguments. Full marks for breadth then. Also full marks for style - this is extremely readable and very funny in places, and all without dumbing down.

The flaw, in my opinion, is that Paulos races through each argument, and particulary the refutations, far too quickly. Each one deserves more than a few pages, more depth and more consideration of counter-arguments. This might have been excused if there were a useful list of further reading for each argument, but one is not included.

A good read then, but there is not enough depth here for my taste.

I would recommend Roy Jackson's "The God of Philosophy" for anyone who wants a deeper look at some of the arguments, though this concentrates on the arguments themselves and is rather light on their criticisms.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful By R Customer on 26 May 2010
Format: Paperback
It is always good to see scientists, academics and intellectuals stating boldly and clearly the reasons why they do not believe in what most of us have been told we must believe in: a personal God. It is a shame that more do not do so. So that is the one point which, for me, counts most for Paulos's book. He has had the courage to publicly declare that he's an atheist and that theism is unreasonable and illogical.

The main reason that I give it only three stars is that it left me feeling unsatisfied. Now this may well be because this is an area in which I have read considerably and I may be unfairly comparing it to other books on irreligion.

It is important to clarify something: despite its title this book is not really about religion but rather the inadequacy of the arguments for belief in God. (By contrast, "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins is possibly more about religion than about the latter. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why it is a far more enjoyable read.)

The arguments do indeed seem very inadequate, so much so that one gets the sense that Paulos didn't have to think too hard to dispose of them. One is left wondering, "Is this really all that theism has going for it?" Unfortunately I think it is - those of us who would like to believe in an omnibenevolent deity are unable to do so for this very reason.

Anyone who takes the question of God's existence seriously should read at least one book of this kind. In that respect, this short book is as good as any.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Look for similar items by category


Feedback