This book would be more accurately titled " 20th Century Irish Political History". In general it is long-winded and lacks focus.
DON'T read this book if you're looking for content that:
a) Covers Irish cultural history, not just political history
b) Presents information chronologically and doesn't meander off the topic
c) Gives an objective view of the conflict between Republicanism and Unionism
d) Applauds the contribution of Eamon de Valera to Irish history
e) Doesn't include material editorial errors, such as not including the 1921 Treaty in the appendix, although referenced
f) Is concise
DO read this book if :
a) You're ok with all of the above
b) You believe that Coogan has a unique insight into lrish history, having been privy to sensitive information for decades, and that that unique insight gives the Author license to be long-winded
c) You want to know the minutae of Irish political developments, including the breakdown of election results
This book exceeded my need for some of that minutae. It comprises 754 pages without the appendices, being about a third too long.
Coogan is fixated with the Republican / Unionist agenda to the detriment of important developments across Irish society. He ignores major cultural issues, such as the dramatic changes brought about by mass uncontrolled immigration in the 1990s. Also nothing is said of the spiral in the level of serious crime, including the exponential growth in the drugs problem throughout the Country.
In short the book is two-dimensional, i.e. politics and religion, with not a spot of paint drying to relieve the fixation on those subjects.
As a former editor of the Irish Press, it is difficult to account for the Author's lack of an editorial tidy-up. For instance changes of topic need more defined breaks and oscillations back and forth across time periods are not clearly noted.
Coogan tells a story a bit like the comedian, Billy Connolly - he tends to get to the point by the scenic route - the difference being that Coogan's storyline sometimes never gets back to the point. For instance the Lemass chapter begins with five unrelated pages about the plight of lrish writers in the 1960's. This preamble has little to do with Lemass and would be more appropriate in Coogan's own memoirs.
In addition, over forty pages of the seventy page Chapter 11, 'Sinn Fein Re-Emerges', have nothing to do with Sinn Fein at all, diverting instead into the political scandals that hit the South in the 1980s and 1990s !
By 1973 Coogan's own writing fortunes had progressed to assisting with writing speeches for Jack Lynch, an interesting insight into how close the Author was to the Fianna Fail government of the time and a fair indicator of his personal political leanings.
The tragedy of the Northern Ireland Troubles is a difficult topic for any writer to capture. No words could adequately describe the havoc wrought by murder and the hatred it breeds from generation to generation. Neither does Coogan adequately capture these tragedies. However, dropping some of those electoral statistics in favour of more of the human impact of the Troubles would have helped.
Some of the book is worth reading, but a lot of it just deserves a skim, ranging from fascinating insights to too much detail on mildly interesting topics. ln general a good editorial 'hair cut' is merited.