Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Trade in Yours
For a 1.82 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

An Iraq of Its Regions: Cornerstones of a Federal Democracy? [Paperback]

Reidar Visser , Gareth Stansfield

RRP: 19.99
Price: 18.14 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
You Save: 1.85 (9%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 3 Sept.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover 56.95  
Paperback 18.14  
Trade In this Item for up to 1.82
Trade in An Iraq of Its Regions: Cornerstones of a Federal Democracy? for an Amazon Gift Card of up to 1.82, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Book Description

15 Nov 2007
The fall of Saddam Hussein s regime may have marked a watershed in Iraqi history, but to the majority of Iraq s eighteen governorates, the most dramatic challenges may lie ahead. With the formation of federal entities south of Kurdistan enabled from 2008, fundamental changes to Iraq's state structure can be expected over the coming decade. The parameters of this open-ended process are poorly understood in the West. There seems to be a widespread belief among commentators that the federalisation of Iraq will lead, more or less automatically, to the creation of three large regions based on Iraq s dominant ethno-religious communities, the Shiite Arabs, the Sunni Arabs and the Kurds. However, if the Iraqi constitution is adhered to, such an outcome is actually quite unlikely. According to the Iraqi charter, ethnicity has no role to play in the delineation of Iraq's federal map. Instead regions geographically defined by the conversion or amalgamation of existing governorates will form the building blocks of the new Iraq, as has already been exemplified in 2009 and again in early 2010 by attempts to create a separate federal region in Basra. This volume is the first to offer a comprehensive overview of regionalism as a political force in contemporary Iraq.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Product details

Product Description


'A very timely, well conceived and expertly developed volume on a matter that, in the growing furore over the Bush administration's war in Iraq, has become a topic of intense debate.' --Joost Hiltermann, International Crisis Group

About the Author

Reidar Visser is a Research Fellow specialising in Iraqi politics at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo. He is the author of Basra, the Failed Gulf State: Separatism and Nationalism in Southern Iraq. Gareth StanSfield is Reader in Middle Eastern Politics at the University of Exeter and author of several books including Iraq: People, History, Politics.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars  1 review
4.0 out of 5 stars An Iraq of Its Regions 13 Jan 2010
By Michael Rubin - Published on Amazon.com
Federalism remains a dominant political debate in post-Saddam Iraq, and while Western commentators often focus on Iraqi Kurdistan, in reality, Iraqi discussions are broader. Visser, a research fellow at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, explains, "Villages, towns, and regions have shaped identities: the people of southern Iraq, for instance, often think of themselves as 'Qurnawis' or 'Basrawis' or just 'Southerners' rather than as 'Shiites' or 'Sunnis.'" Indeed, Visser persuades us that the conventional wisdom that Iraq is an amalgam of three Ottoman provinces--one Sunni, one Shi'i, and one Kurdish--is wrong for that identity is more complex and disparate. Sorbonne historian Alastair Northedge fleshes out this point more with the definitive essay tracing the development of Iraqi identity prior to the Ottoman trifurcation of the region, while Richard Schofield of King's College London sketches a useful outline of the drawing of modern Iraqi boundaries.

Visser's introduction to An Iraq of Its Regions (Columbia University Press, 2008) is detailed and well-grounded in historiography. So, too, is his contribution on the two regions of southern Iraq. He argues persuasively that much of the Western media misinterpreted Iraqi Shi'i leader 'Abdul 'Aziz Hakim's demand for a single southern, federal region, and that discussion in southern Iraq revolves around two regions: the Basra-Amara-Nasiriya triangle and another in the Middle Euphrates region, although he also describes minor variations that arise from time to time.

Exeter University scholars Fanar Haddad and Sajjad Rizvi's contribution on fitting Baghdad into the federalist discourse pales next to Visser's work, but after a somewhat disjointed discussion of federalism in other countries and federalism "from above" as opposed to "from below," they persuasively show through interviews the fears that many Baghdadis have that federalism might lead to the dissolution of the state.

University of Haifa historian Ronen Zeidel reprises his thesis on regionalism around Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's home town of Tikrit in a separate chapter. Utilizing several Arabic histories and other sources, Zeidel writes a definitive, local history of Tikrit from the sixteenth century through the present day with a special emphasis on the rise of the Tikritis in the Iraqi military and power structure in the second half of the twentieth century. Zeidal shows that the primacy of Tikriti regional identity did not survive Saddam's overthrow, since Tikriti refusal to fight advancing coalition forces shattered regional solidarity. De-Baathification hit Tikrit hard. To cope, many residents subordinated the regional identity about which they had been so proud to a broader Sunni identity.

An essay by James Denselow, a doctoral candidate at King's College, London, is the only true disappointment in the collection. Rather than provide a survey of Mosul equivalent in depth to Visser's or Zeidel's contributions, Denselow substitutes historical background for a survey of secondary sources by authors like Avi Shlaim, Rashid Khalidi, and Juan Cole, none of whom ever visited Iraq and whose writing accordingly tends toward the polemical. Denselow's failure to address the consolidation of Mosul's identity after Saddam's fall, the struggles to reverse gerrymandering around Sinjar, Tel Afar's unique identity, and issues surrounding the resurgence across the border of Kurdish nationalism in Qamishli, the largest town in eastern Syria, are omissions that raise questions about why the editors did not seek revision before inclusion. Meanwhile, Denselow's discussion of the artificiality and porousness of the Syria-Iraq border is nothing new; his conclusion that "informed quarters" recognize that the Syrians have done their utmost to secure the border reads more like an academic's attempt to secure Syrian good will than a work of scholarly integrity.

University of Exeter historian Gareth Stansfield and his colleague Hashem Ahmadzadeh show a mastery of Iraqi Kurdish issues in a chapter that examines Kurdish and Kurdistani identities. The authors look both at the political debate in Iraqi Kurdistan--where the former term refers to ethnic identity and the latter is a way to signal equality in Iraqi Kurdistan for non-Kurdish residents, be they Turkmen, Chaldean, Assyrian, or Arab--and at the Kurdistani term's original pan-Kurdish overtones. Kurdish historical writing is notorious for unsourced claims and a retroactive imposition of nationalism. Both authors avoid this pitfall and provide a well-researched narrative, although Stansfield's penchant for vanity footnotes distracts. Still, "Kurdish or Kurdistanis? Conceptualising Regionalism in the North of Iraq" should be required reading for anyone seeking to understand Iraqi Kurdish politics.

Few edited collections have value greater than a single constituent essay. An Iraq of Its Regions is an exception--Visser and Stansfield have assembled a unique work that should become the handbook for any serious discussion of Iraqi regionalism.

Michael Rubin
Middle East Quarterly
Winter 2010
Was this review helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category