- Jubilee offer: spend £10 or more on any product sold by Amazon.co.uk on or before June 6 and you can buy The Diamond Jubilee A Classical Celebration Album for just £2.50 Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
Integral Consciousness and the Future of Evolution
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| |||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £4.30
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Integral Consciousness and the Future of Evolution for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £4.30, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
"McIntosh's book is an educational journey through the fundamentals of integral philosophy and a fascinating exploration of some its most important themes. Carefully researched and tightly argued, this work is an important contribution to a field destined to impact world culture and the direction of human evolution."--, "What Is Enlightenment? "
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Steve McIntosh has sought to establish himself as an independent and original contributor to Integral philosophy with this book. He largely succeeds in differentiating his viewpoints from those of integral 'guru' Wilber without becoming unnecessarily confrontational.
His account of the historical development of 'integralism' is revealing and cogent. He is right in highlighting the importance of Hegel as the first truly 'integral' philosopher and he is equally adroit in paying tribute to Wilber as the first 'post-postmodern' integral thinker.
A welcome addition to any 'integral' library.
His account of the historical development of 'integralism' is revealing and cogent. He is right in highlighting the importance of Hegel as the first truly 'integral' philosopher and he is equally adroit in paying tribute to Wilber as the first 'post-postmodern' integral thinker.
A welcome addition to any 'integral' library.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
This is a whirlwind tour of the emerging field of integral theory and is...first-class.
An excellent and in-depth overview of the main contours of the domain, and is no easy read either. Even though I picked this up and could not put it down for three evenings in a row, so eager was I to get through it, it is somewhat of an intellectual challenge in places and will have you reading and re-reading parts (in particular his criticisms of Wilber).
It is even illuminating in places, particularly in the appendices (which seems to be the case with integral theorists; don't know why) in particular with its explication of beauty.
A must-read for anyone with a serious interest in this domain, this book is highly recommended.
An excellent and in-depth overview of the main contours of the domain, and is no easy read either. Even though I picked this up and could not put it down for three evenings in a row, so eager was I to get through it, it is somewhat of an intellectual challenge in places and will have you reading and re-reading parts (in particular his criticisms of Wilber).
It is even illuminating in places, particularly in the appendices (which seems to be the case with integral theorists; don't know why) in particular with its explication of beauty.
A must-read for anyone with a serious interest in this domain, this book is highly recommended.
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Steve McIntosh's book "Integral consciousness and the future of evolution" is an in-house critique of Ken Wilber's Integral Theory. While McIntosh considers himself to be a supporter of Integral philosophy, he has taken the liberty to revise or amplify Wilber's system on a number of points. Thus, his book is less sycophantic than most other "integral" works.
The most obvious difference between McIntosh and Wilber is that the former doesn't want to connect Integral philosophy to a specific spiritual tradition. Wilber, by contrast, is preaching a version of Advaita or Vajrayana. McIntosh is spiritual, but seems to stand closer to Christianity than to the Eastern systems of thought. He doubts that humanity can prove, at the present time at any rate, which spiritual system is the highest or best. He therefore advises Integral philosophy to affirm spirituality in general, while remaining uncommitted on the question of which spiritual tradition is closest to the truth.
Somewhat ironically, McIntosh also criticizes Wilber's post-metaphysical turn. Logically, post-metaphysics should suite McIntosh better, since he wants to remain uncommitted on the exact nature of Spirit. However, the author believes that at least a "minimal metaphysics" are necessary, since nobody can really dispense with metaphysical speculations.
Other criticisms feel very in-house, as when McIntosh criticizes some aspects of Wilber's Four Quadrant model.
Perhaps to free himself from Wilber's overarching shadow, McIntosh briefly describes the ideas of philosophers and psychologists he considers to be the forerunners of Integral Theory. The list includes Hegel, Bergson, Teilhard de Chardin, Aurobindo, Whitehead and Habermas. Interestingly, McIntosh doesn't mention Plotinus, Schelling and Lovejoy's book "The Great Chain of Being", all considered of paramount importance by Wilber. Also, McIntosh plays down Aurobindo, which Wilber does not. They only concur on seeing Habermas as extremely important.
"Integral consciousness and the future of evolution" also contain some pretty weird political proposals for a world federation. These are nebulous, naïve and contradictory.
On one point, at least, McIntosh is actually more simplistic than Wilber. His overview of human history lacks any mention of the matrifocal societies of the Neolithic. Nor does it mention the existence of peaceful high cultures such as the Indus Valley Civilization. Instead, McIntosh jumps directly from "tribal" consciousness (presumably the Palaeolithic) to "warrior" consciousness (presumably Homeric Greece). Wilber, by contrast, have attempted to wrestle with the implications of a matriarchal stage in human history. Personally, I don't think he has succeeded very well, but at least he sees the problem. McIntosh does not.
To be honest, I found "Integral consciousness and the future of evolution" to be boring, tedious and in-house. Half-way through, I got tired of the book. It's probably of interest only to those who consider the world of Ken Wilber worth the while investigating.
The most obvious difference between McIntosh and Wilber is that the former doesn't want to connect Integral philosophy to a specific spiritual tradition. Wilber, by contrast, is preaching a version of Advaita or Vajrayana. McIntosh is spiritual, but seems to stand closer to Christianity than to the Eastern systems of thought. He doubts that humanity can prove, at the present time at any rate, which spiritual system is the highest or best. He therefore advises Integral philosophy to affirm spirituality in general, while remaining uncommitted on the question of which spiritual tradition is closest to the truth.
Somewhat ironically, McIntosh also criticizes Wilber's post-metaphysical turn. Logically, post-metaphysics should suite McIntosh better, since he wants to remain uncommitted on the exact nature of Spirit. However, the author believes that at least a "minimal metaphysics" are necessary, since nobody can really dispense with metaphysical speculations.
Other criticisms feel very in-house, as when McIntosh criticizes some aspects of Wilber's Four Quadrant model.
Perhaps to free himself from Wilber's overarching shadow, McIntosh briefly describes the ideas of philosophers and psychologists he considers to be the forerunners of Integral Theory. The list includes Hegel, Bergson, Teilhard de Chardin, Aurobindo, Whitehead and Habermas. Interestingly, McIntosh doesn't mention Plotinus, Schelling and Lovejoy's book "The Great Chain of Being", all considered of paramount importance by Wilber. Also, McIntosh plays down Aurobindo, which Wilber does not. They only concur on seeing Habermas as extremely important.
"Integral consciousness and the future of evolution" also contain some pretty weird political proposals for a world federation. These are nebulous, naïve and contradictory.
On one point, at least, McIntosh is actually more simplistic than Wilber. His overview of human history lacks any mention of the matrifocal societies of the Neolithic. Nor does it mention the existence of peaceful high cultures such as the Indus Valley Civilization. Instead, McIntosh jumps directly from "tribal" consciousness (presumably the Palaeolithic) to "warrior" consciousness (presumably Homeric Greece). Wilber, by contrast, have attempted to wrestle with the implications of a matriarchal stage in human history. Personally, I don't think he has succeeded very well, but at least he sees the problem. McIntosh does not.
To be honest, I found "Integral consciousness and the future of evolution" to be boring, tedious and in-house. Half-way through, I got tired of the book. It's probably of interest only to those who consider the world of Ken Wilber worth the while investigating.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
