The key flaw of this book is held within it's title. to offer insite on genius is a massive task and one that should have been taken a little more cautiously in my view.
Miller is clearly most comfortable in the regurgitation of theories and in this he is relatively sucessfull however a analysis of those theories would have been appreciated.
The Real problems start when Miller (...) tries to offer his own views on the scentists and artists regarded here.
Miller is clearly defined by his background in physics. I would however guess he is from the historical appreciation rather than practice(either theoretical or practical) and this is brough out by his rather 'pop science' approach to the ideas expoused within.
Instead of following the progression of theory he instead covers this with the view that it takes a great deal of work to be a geneous and that there may be some ill defined spark.
Worse yet the understanding of the theories discussed seems to lack judgement and connection between theory...
Phsycology it would seem would have more answer to the questions he poses and this is where the next failing is shown. Miller... is forced to limmit his insight to his reading which is in turn limmited in scope (as is his appreciation of Aesthetics, Art History, Mathematics) and you often get the feeling he would have been better off restricting his works to a strict history of science with no movement towards interpretation of theory.
This is not to say the book has no worth, there are few books with the ego to cover the topics held here. However I would recomend any reader intrested first understand the scientific theories and then read books on phsycology to fill in the rest, in my opinion Miller offers nothing over a Bsc Cog Sci students initial reaction to the fields covered and is severly lacking in understanding and depth on many of the areas covered here.