| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() Trade In this Item for up to £2.80
Trade in Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £2.80, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Important work on visual thinking,
By A Customer
This review is from: Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (Paperback)
I found this book a revelation. It's one of the best things I've read on the role of visual thinking in science--especially in Einstein's work, a subject on which Miller is probably the world's leading expert. If you want to understand something about why quantum theory seemed so unimaginably foreign for much of the twentieth century, and why Feynman's contribution is so important, this is the book to read. But it is not for the unsophisticated. Speaking of which, of the preceding reviews I will say only that talent recognizes genius, but mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself. Miller knows something about genius.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Disjointed,
By A Customer
This review is from: Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (Paperback)
The main problem with this book is organisation of ideas. Because of this, you will be hard pressed to understand what Arthur I. Miller is really trying to tell us. One moment, he is discussing atoms, then he talks about quantum theory, then about Galileo's thought experiments, then about Einstein's Relativity, and then about how our brains process information. There is no coherence in discussion but topics are brought up randomly only to be replaced by equally random topics. Just when you thought discussion on quantum theory is over and done with, this topic comes up again in later chapters, and the cycle of random topics start again. Consequently, I really had a hard time trying to piece together different ideas discussed in this book. It is almost as if Arthur I. Miller drops all the facts at once on your desk and leaves you to sort out what the facts mean.
0 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Perhaps the Author should consider limmiting the scope,
By A Customer
This review is from: Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (Paperback)
The key flaw of this book is held within it's title. to offer insite on genius is a massive task and one that should have been taken a little more cautiously in my view.Miller is clearly most comfortable in the regurgitation of theories and in this he is relatively sucessfull however a analysis of those theories would have been appreciated. The Real problems start when Miller (...) tries to offer his own views on the scentists and artists regarded here. Miller is clearly defined by his background in physics. I would however guess he is from the historical appreciation rather than practice(either theoretical or practical) and this is brough out by his rather 'pop science' approach to the ideas expoused within. Instead of following the progression of theory he instead covers this with the view that it takes a great deal of work to be a geneous and that there may be some ill defined spark. Worse yet the understanding of the theories discussed seems to lack judgement and connection between theory... Phsycology it would seem would have more answer to the questions he poses and this is where the next failing is shown. Miller... is forced to limmit his insight to his reading which is in turn limmited in scope (as is his appreciation of Aesthetics, Art History, Mathematics) and you often get the feeling he would have been better off restricting his works to a strict history of science with no movement towards interpretation of theory. This is not to say the book has no worth, there are few books with the ego to cover the topics held here. However I would recomend any reader intrested first understand the scientific theories and then read books on phsycology to fill in the rest, in my opinion Miller offers nothing over a Bsc Cog Sci students initial reaction to the fields covered and is severly lacking in understanding and depth on many of the areas covered here.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|
|
|